Wheel and Tire thread

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

RacingTurtles

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Posts
60
Reaction score
30
Location
Pennsylvania
First Name
Apu
Truck Year
1990
Truck Model
v1500 Geneva Edition
Engine Size
350 tbi
I'd like to start a thread where people can post their wheel and tire setups to show off and help people decide in their next wheel setup.

Just like the other threads of this nature, it would be helpful to include as much info as you.
Your model vehicle
Wheel specs
Tire specs
Any suspension modifications or body modifications needed to run your wheel/tire setup.
How your truck handles/feels/ anything else you wish to comment on

Unfortunately, I have no idea what wheels are on my suburban and I haven't removed them yet. I got her with a mismatched set of tires and I'm due to get new tires.

https://flic.kr/p/2hfkZFP
You must be registered for see images attach
Geneva suburban by https://www.flickr.com/photos/184311112@N03/

1990 Suburban V1500. No suspension mods,its probably all original suspension, has running boards, factory 4x4 height as far as I can tell.

Front Tires
BFG All terrain T/A 31 x 10.5 R15
Notes: Tires got inflated at 40, 45, and 50 psi and felt the same.

Rear Tires
Michelin LTX M/S 31 x 10.5 R15
Notes: Tires were only inflated at 50 psi. These are super bald, as if the previous owner did burnouts with this thing. Rear end kinda looks like it's sagging, see how the truck looks level in a driveway that's angled downward?
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,875
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
245/65/16 1980 gmc k25 stock hd front and rear suspension, which i would assume is highest factory lift. worn out a bit

they work good for snow plowing. wider than i would like on the truck

You must be registered for see images attach
 

45tt

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Posts
273
Reaction score
1,032
Location
Florida
First Name
MJ
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
GMC Sierra Grande K15
Engine Size
350
1975 Sierra Grande - US Wheel 15x8 Slots with BF Goodrich KO2 33x12.50x15. Pro Comp 2.5” lift with added Pro Comp Dual shock steering stabilizer. It felt a little loose after the lift and tires that’s the reason for the steering stabilizer addition.
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

FireTruck1984

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
2,987
Reaction score
9,941
Location
Michigan
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1984 and 1984
Truck Model
High Sierra K1500 350. Sierra Classic C1500 305.
Engine Size
350, 305
1975 Sierra Grande - US Wheel 15x8 Slots with BF Goodrich KO2 33x12.50x15. Pro Comp 2.5” lift with added Pro Comp Dual shock steering stabilizer. It felt a little loose after the lift and tires that’s the reason for the steering stabilizer addition.
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
Love it ! The ‘75 is a great looking truck.
 

FireTruck1984

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
2,987
Reaction score
9,941
Location
Michigan
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1984 and 1984
Truck Model
High Sierra K1500 350. Sierra Classic C1500 305.
Engine Size
350, 305
BFG 255/70 R 15 on 15x8 wheels w 1.5” wheel spacers on rear only
You must be registered for see images attach
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,875
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
BFG 255/70 R 15 on 15x8 wheels w 1.5” wheel spacers on rear only
You must be registered for see images attach
doesnt having the rear same/wider than the front cause tracking or driveability issues?
 

FireTruck1984

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
2,987
Reaction score
9,941
Location
Michigan
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1984 and 1984
Truck Model
High Sierra K1500 350. Sierra Classic C1500 305.
Engine Size
350, 305
doesnt having the rear same/wider than the front cause tracking or driveability issues?
No, no issues at all. The track is still a little narrower than the front and this fills the wheel opening much better. It’s an easy mod that makes a big impact.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
7,077
Reaction score
12,445
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
doesnt having the rear same/wider than the front cause tracking or driveability issues?

" Both versions had a front track width of 65.8 inches and a rear track width of 62.7 inches." - 87 GM Pickups for example. They come from the factory 3" narrower in the rear.
It's very common for vehicles to have different front and rear track widths and performance cars with staggered tire size. Think duallys as the most extreme example.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,875
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
" Both versions had a front track width of 65.8 inches and a rear track width of 62.7 inches." - 87 GM Pickups for example. They come from the factory 3" narrower in the rear.
It's very common for vehicles to have different front and rear track widths and performance cars with staggered tire size. Think duallys as the most extreme example.
yes im saying he put spacers in the back, probably making it wider in the back.

but nice to hear it didnt and he has no issues with it :)
 

legopnuematic

Licensed Junk Dealer
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Posts
2,600
Reaction score
6,836
Location
MO
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1971, 1̶9̶7̶4, 1976, 1979,1̶9̶8̶5, 2002
Truck Model
Dart Swinger, Sierra 10, C10 Cheyenne, C10 Big Ten, Silverado 10, Ram 2500
Engine Size
225/6, 350 c.i., 350 c.i., 5.9l Cummins
My 76 with 15x8's and 31/10.5/15 K02's
You must be registered for see images attach
 

77 K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Posts
3,106
Reaction score
3,141
Location
Montana
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
K20 5" lift
Engine Size
HT383 fuel injected
" Both versions had a front track width of 65.8 inches and a rear track width of 62.7 inches." - 87 GM Pickups for example. They come from the factory 3" narrower in the rear.
It's very common for vehicles to have different front and rear track widths and performance cars with staggered tire size. Think duallys as the most extreme example.

I've heard that repeatedly for many years. But I've never really heard WHY. Why have a different track front vs rear? I had a 1993 Audi where the rear track was wider than the front. Then I bought a 2000 Audi and it was the opposite. Front was wider than the rear.

What is wrong with having the rear tires follow the same ruts as the front? The best I've heard was so "the rear tires can get a different bite than the front".

:shrug:
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,392
Posts
956,363
Members
36,687
Latest member
brentlent
Top