Unfortunately, it looks corroded and then someone painted over it. I can't make out the year. 84 maybe
You must be registered for see images attach
I see and 84 or 85 in that, I think that means we can know it came with that crossmember for sure and its from a chevy truck which makes our 85-86 k series idea make sense.
Nothing wrong in that, but it does mean that you need the same the pedastal for the adapter unless you want to change from that to a long foot adapter which to my understanding were criminally able to brake especially when lacking a strut rod which yours appears to as well as mine. runs to the bellhousing I think. to the passneger side of the t case where two large holes are. keeps them from cracking from twist. (Them being anything that cant take tthw twisty twists)
You must be registered for see images attach
this is what yours should look like, the skid plate then covers the exposed part that extends off the back toward the back of the truck. your crossmember also utilizes the 2 sets of holes that would lay flat on the bottom of your C channel while the smaller trucks or yourscurrently uses the middle set which are also offset for reasons Im not quite sure, possibly different set for a different application where its further or back or to make it directional or something.
Actually now that I realize, a flat crossmember which can put slots on the center where the mount sits may be able to work just fine for yours.. assuming the np208 front output doesnt absolutely need that clearance which it might.
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
That combo would probably keep your transfer case from hitting it... but it would the weakpoint because its kinda like on stilts if that makes sense.
Which is why they moved away from it
You must be registered for see images attach
I guess I dont know what that is for but thats the same idea regardless I was trying to pass on about the mount.
also it seems the S crossmember came into play with cat converters perhaps where the placement of them and the pipe to and from would better have the pipe pass under the crossmember rather than potentially collide because of the width above it on a W.
If you arent married to your np208 or rear driveshaft or this SM465 you have the options of going to a sm465 with a np205 from early but you would have to go to a mechanical clutch unless you want to make your hydraulic clutch stuff work which is an upgrade to many. Otherwise a later sm465 and np205 combo has to exist but I imagine its not very common but determination beats obstacles if you got the determination lol
Otherwise perfect opportunity to do what you want. I dont know what goes into converting the clutch over but if you want your manual I imagine already having the setup is 90% of th work when it comes to the bellhousings which should swap and the fork and stuff already in posession.
If you want to go to an auto of some kind you will want a steering column which is always a great opportunity for tilt since your manual column someone put in probably doesnt tilt OR They left the auto column in and you have a shifter tube just a missing handle or they didnt even go that far. Still got a pointer on dash?