Bextreme04
Full Access Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Posts
- 4,464
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Oregon
- First Name
- Eric
- Truck Year
- 1980
- Truck Model
- K25
- Engine Size
- 350-4bbl
Both of these are tied together. Emissions, fuel efficiency, and power robbing are all related. It takes energy to move the air... period. The idea that it doesn't take any power for the fan to move the fan is just nonsense, it is mechanical energy. The reason they went to electric fans is the same reason they went to more precise alternator control and DOD/AFM. The EPA requirements added minimum fuel economy requirements that hit the manufacturer with "points" depending on the average fuel economy. Running a mechanical fan at freeway speeds where you don't need ANY fan at all turns out to be a fairly significant parasitic drain.The OEM started to use electric fans due to emissions requirements. If they didn’t have to meet such extreme emissions, they would probably still be using mechanical fans. The advantage of electric fans is more precise control. The ORM have to meet demanding cold start emissions, anything that can be done to get the engine warmed up as fast as possible is worth the effort. Electric fans don’t do anything until the PCM commands them on. A thermal fan clutch still spins even disengaged, it still draws airflow thru the radiator, and slows engine warmup ever so slightly.
As far as mechanical fans robbing power, I say ********. I base this statement on some testing I did a few years ago. I was at the dragsrip with some friends on a test and tune night when the typical bench racing started. I like my cars with the kinda stock looks, even though very little is factory. The aftermarket go fast stuff I have added is either hidden in plain sight, or just not obvious. One of my buddies commented on the factory fan wasting power, I argued that unless the clutch is engaged, the fan isn’t doing much. To test my theory, I made a couple passes with the car as I normally run it, just to establish a baseline. I then removed the fan and clutch, and made a couple more passes. The E.T. was basically the same, the mile per hour did go up ever so slightly. There is zero doubt in my mind thermal fan clutches consume a slight amount of power, but certainly not the 20hp people seem to think they do!! In my opinion, the .04-.05 loss in mph is well worth never having to stress over engine temp. The hottest I have ever seen the Olds get is about 205, this was in bumper to bumper traffic, in 90*heat, with the A/C on.
Here's an actual factual analysis of just how much drain those fans have... rather than just anecdotal, seat of the pants type analysis. I agree it is probably peanuts on a race car making a 1/4 mile pass. For cruising on the freeway, where the engine is only really making ~100hp or so to keep the car moving, it can add up fast.
https://drivemag.com/video/cooling-fan-shoot-out-engine-masters-ep-20
I got the entire electric fan setup... including the fans, relay box, wiring, connectors, etc.. for about $75. They are all over every junkyard around here. Its getting harder and harder to find any metal OEM type fans. The 9 blade that came on the heavy 454's are completely unavailable and a new fan clutch would cost just as much as the entire electric fan setup.I agree with this. A guy has to drop a darn good bit of money to even get a mediocre aftemarket setup. Look at the CFM air flow of a $200 aftermarket setup vs a factory 5 or 7 blade fan. IMO the only reason new vehicles have gone electric is fuel economy and possibly because they can be better controlled by the computer though Ford did use an electronically coupled mechanical fan at one time, the electronic coupler was controlled by the PCM and took the place of the thermoclutch connected using clockspring style contact set.