Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Catbox

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Posts
4,452
Reaction score
16,682
Location
Just Outside of Portland Oregon
First Name
Peter
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
C20 Silverado Camper Special
Engine Size
461
When I do quench, I look for any number between 0.040 and 0.060.

That range has proven to be just fine for an every day engine.
Since you are putting this into a heavy K20, you may want to rethink the overall package.
Torque is what you are after, not top end power.
A super flat torque curve will make you way happier.

Put the largest part of your budget to the heads that will best suit your need.
If that means you have to run a stock crank instead of the stroker, so be it.
With bitchin heads you will be able to make up for it in drivability.

A high compression engine like what I am seeing will not like being lugged around off road.
It will want to rev and breathe.

Build for torque and enjoy an engine that pushes you back into the seat when you punch it.
 
Last edited:

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,775
Reaction score
1,004
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Last edited:

shiftpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Posts
4,855
Reaction score
6,092
Location
BC Canada
First Name
shiftpro
Truck Year
73-87
Truck Model
1500, 2500, 3500
Engine Size
350, 383, 454, 496!
When I do quench, I look for any number between 0.040 and 0.060.

That range has proven to be just fine for an every day engine.
Since you are putting this into a heavy K20, you may want to rethink the overall package.
Torque is what you are after, not top end power.
A super flat torque curve will make you way happier.

Put the largest part of your budget to the heads that will best suit your need.
If that means you have to run a stock crank instead of the stroker, so be it.
With bitchin heads you will be able to make up for it in drivability.

A high compression engine like what I am seeing will not like being lugged around off road.
It will want to rev and breathe.

Build for torque and enjoy an engine that pushes you back into the seat when you punch it.


High compression is fine for low rpm and torque. That's all in the cam.
But to be fair, my personal experience with this was running propane. A torque cam with heads that flow enough to support 700 hp (BB 781 or 449, larger valves and open bowls), twin Impco 425 'pane carbs and what a wonderful combo.
Anyway, carry on.
 

Preston Tucker

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2020
Posts
106
Reaction score
50
Location
Maine
First Name
Preston
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350

hirschdalechevy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Posts
726
Reaction score
517
Location
norcal
First Name
rich
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
k-30
Engine Size
454
Why not add a thicker gasket?


Because you will destroy your quench. Lets say you are 9.5 to 1 compression at .060 quench with a cam that has a early intake valve closing point, so you are building fairly high cylinder pressure. A .060 quench may not like pump gas, (detonation), but that same engine with the same cam at .040 quench would be ok on pump gas.

So instead of running a flat top piston with a 64 cc head and a thick head gasket to get say 9.5 to 1 compression you would be better off to run a d-dish piston and a thin head gasket, (to tighten the quench), to get the same 9.5 to 1 compression.
 
Last edited:

hirschdalechevy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Posts
726
Reaction score
517
Location
norcal
First Name
rich
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
k-30
Engine Size
454
I will throw this in for you, I just put this engine in my 1977 blazer.

It's a nice little 350 with vortec heads 9.5 to one compression with a 215/223 @ .050 , .473/.473 lift, 108 lsa , hydraulic roller cam. It's 357 hp , 410 tq and it pulls my blazer, (on 38 inch rubber), around really well. Also 9.5 to 1 compression is fine for lugging around off road , I do it all the time.

You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Preston Tucker

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2020
Posts
106
Reaction score
50
Location
Maine
First Name
Preston
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
My current recipe I was going to try for was a 15cc d dished piston with a .038 head gasket which gets me around 9.5:1 and thats borderline 87 octane if i am right.
 

hirschdalechevy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Posts
726
Reaction score
517
Location
norcal
First Name
rich
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
k-30
Engine Size
454
You have to measure the stack like I said earlier, if you run that .038 head gasket and your piston is .025 down in the block thats a quench of .063, (no good). If your piston is down .015 in the block then you are at .053 quench, (still no good). Do the math of your stack.

If your piston is .025 down you could run a fel pro #10094 head gaskets that are .015 thick and that would give you a quench of .040, (perfect), but your 15cc dish piston would be to high of compression. You would need to run a piston with like a 20cc dish but you have to do the math to pick the perfect cc piston for your combustion chamber size and quench distance.

Or you deck the block so your pistons are at 0 deck, (or close to it) then you can run a .039 to .041 head gasket and be at or close to .040 quench. Either way a 15cc d-dish piston puts you in the 10 to 1 plus range at .040 quench so you may want to re think your pistons if you want to be in the 9's.

The better the quench the higher compression you can get away with on pump gas and the cam comes into play with that as well, (intake valve close point) witch dictates cylinder pressure.

Hope this helps, do the math, get your set up right and you will have a daily driver that will be 400 plus hp with tons of torque.

Depending on your cam choice you may be in the 91 octane range.
 
Last edited:

Joshua Keith

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Posts
380
Reaction score
552
Location
Memphis
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I will throw this in for you, I just put this engine in my 1977 blazer.

It's a nice little 350 with vortec heads 9.5 to one compression with a 215/223 @ .050 , .473/.473 lift, 108 lsa , hydraulic roller cam. It's 357 hp , 410 tq and it pulls my blazer, (on 38 inch rubber), around really well. Also 9.5 to 1 compression is fine for lugging around off road , I do it all the time.

@hirschdalechevy Do you recall what pistons and head gasket you used with this setup?
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,439
Reaction score
5,581
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
When you start getting above 9 or 9.5:1 on a street engine it becomes more and more important to look at quench area and dynamic compression ratio with a specific cam. There have been many good suggestions here. I did flat top pistons with about 6cc of dish from valve reliefs and had .020" milled off the deck to bring the deck clearance to about .018". Then I ran .027" compressed thickness chevrolet performance head gaskets to get the quench and compression I wanted. So I ended up with around 9:1 static compression, .045" quench, and around 8.1:1 dynamic compression with a mild torque cam.

The power, response, and drivability are good and I have zero problems with detonation on 87 octane. I'm all-in on the motor for about $1500. That's about $550 in machine work and the rest in parts. Stock 75cc heads that have been cleaned up with minor bowl blending and chamber polish. If you wanted a real ripper you could easily do the same thing but only have .010" taken off the deck, run 64cc AFR heads and .018" shim gaskets. That would have you all-in at ~$3500 with high quality aluminum heads that would put you in the ~350-400hp range
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,165
Posts
950,712
Members
36,279
Latest member
MTBR12
Top