1989 Chevy K1500

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

CheemsK1500

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Posts
831
Reaction score
1,471
Location
Texas
First Name
Paul
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K1500
Engine Size
305
The doors increased in weight but the hinges are basically like squares, right? so the extra weight and size and larger glass on the same hardware in the same amount of time = sag city? The 1996 i have doesnt have too bad of a drivers door surprisingly, for a silverado trim door.
I noticed the small hinges when I looked at my friends ‘95 WT with its driver door hanging on for dear life. From what I’ve seen, the hinges seem a little undersized for square body doors too, although the sag doesn’t seem nearly as bad as a lot of GMT400s I’ve seen. Not beefing up the hinges for the heavier doors on the GMT400 was one of GM’s more questionable design choices on these trucks. Thankfully they mastered the art of the door hinge by the time the GMT800 was introduced.

I won’t pick on GM too much for this though, because I’ve seen many 80-96 Ford doors sag, and a sagging Ford door gives you the added bonus of snapping off interior door handles on a regular basis until you get the latch/striker alignment just right. This applies to both the early die cast handles and the later plastic ones.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,428
Reaction score
28,292
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
The doors increased in weight but the hinges are basically like squares, right? so the extra weight and size and larger glass on the same hardware in the same amount of time = sag city? The 1996 i have doesnt have too bad of a drivers door surprisingly, for a silverado trim door.

I noticed the small hinges when I looked at my friends ‘95 WT with its driver door hanging on for dear life. From what I’ve seen, the hinges seem a little undersized for square body doors too, although the sag doesn’t seem nearly as bad as a lot of GMT400s I’ve seen. Not beefing up the hinges for the heavier doors on the GMT400 was one of GM’s more questionable design choices on these trucks. Thankfully they mastered the art of the door hinge by the time the GMT800 was introduced.

I won’t pick on GM too much for this though, because I’ve seen many 80-96 Ford doors sag, and a sagging Ford door gives you the added bonus of snapping off interior door handles on a regular basis until you get the latch/striker alignment just right. This applies to both the early die cast handles and the later plastic ones.

I don't *think* the newer doors are much heavier, if at all. I've never weighed them, but they feel about the same I guess.

It's my belief that the hinge pins fail more often on the '88-up trucks due to the design of the cab. Rain water runs down the channel in the upper door jamb and right down onto the hinges. This washes the lube away much faster, and people don't often lube their hinges enough anyway. The '94+ S10's also have the same issue.

The '96-current Express vans use the same basic hinge design and size, but they really don't wear out the pins and bushings nearly as often. I believe those doors are heavier too.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,869
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
I don't *think* the newer doors are much heavier, if at all. I've never weighed them, but they feel about the same I guess.

It's my belief that the hinge pins fail more often on the '88-up trucks due to the design of the cab. Rain water runs down the channel in the upper door jamb and right down onto the hinges. This washes the lube away much faster, and people don't often lube their hinges enough anyway. The '94+ S10's also have the same issue.

The '96-current Express vans use the same basic hinge design and size, but they really don't wear out the pins and bushings nearly as often. I believe those doors are heavier too.
I would be confused how the doors could be much lighter construction with larger size and not be very... flexible lol. The glass piece itself is larger, albeit i dont know how much larger. that would be some weight there. Then a bigger door panel/with more to it
The seal setup to the cab isnt great, for sure. the gmt800 is improved but its not that much better. I did appreciate the addition of more seals to a strange excess lol, not sure what GM was doing lol. Esp if you have an extended cab (extra seal between the doors that isnt a perimeter one x2)

But as far as the doors go, a base model gmt400 door i could see being light and on par, since there is no vent window assembly which is , to be fair, quite hefty in the squares. Wonder how well hinges on deleted vent window squares go lol. Is there more open space on the double wall/brace/cross piece in the gmt400 door than a square (quite closed up)

If you want some stuff that would be beneficial, if the truck has working ac, you would benefit from this:
You must be registered for see images attach


Also, the door hinge stuff is apparently different after 91?

You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach

Not sure why GM cuts the gmt400 in half with these, the part numbers are the same it turns out.

Also found these, may be helpful for next summer? not sure if they came with the valve OEM but we all know how much that little bit of difference of hot coolant not circulating the heater core while the AC is on can drop temp in the vents like 15 or more degrees
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,869
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
I noticed the small hinges when I looked at my friends ‘95 WT with its driver door hanging on for dear life. From what I’ve seen, the hinges seem a little undersized for square body doors too, although the sag doesn’t seem nearly as bad as a lot of GMT400s I’ve seen. Not beefing up the hinges for the heavier doors on the GMT400 was one of GM’s more questionable design choices on these trucks. Thankfully they mastered the art of the door hinge by the time the GMT800 was introduced.

I won’t pick on GM too much for this though, because I’ve seen many 80-96 Ford doors sag, and a sagging Ford door gives you the added bonus of snapping off interior door handles on a regular basis until you get the latch/striker alignment just right. This applies to both the early die cast handles and the later plastic ones.
my 96 f150 i think the door was over-opened, the cab where the hinge mounts is distorted.. lol
 

squaredeal91

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
2,522
Reaction score
4,550
Location
Cave junction Oregon
First Name
Greg bush
Truck Year
1991 SB
Truck Model
K30
Engine Size
5.9 Cummins 12 valve
I like your 89 allot man!
On the gmt 400 doors there dang heavy. The hinge brackets are welded in. On our 99 I fixed the sloppy pin hole by adding material slowly with a mig only adding where it was lost. Git it close but too tight to pound in. Heated the hole orange hot then pounded old pin through hot hole and it made a new tight machined like hole. Now it's all tight!
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,428
Reaction score
28,292
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Like I said, I've never actually weighed them. Just lifted a bunch of them and never really noticed that they were heavier. Maybe that's why my back hurts so much these days, lol.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,132
Posts
949,981
Members
36,237
Latest member
fr3ak5how
Top