Its been said NON Greaseable U-Joints are stronger because they do not have a void with channels to allow grease to flow, where Greaseable U-Joints will have a void throughout to allow grease to travel throughout all cups and bearings from the single grease zerk.
Is it actually true that NON Greaseable really don't have a void in them and they are 100% solid making them stronger than Greaseable.???
Obviously there are Pros and Cons to both type. This will be our official thread for U-Joint discussions, opinions and a place to explain our U-Joint Experiences. Not just discussion of Greasable or NON Greasable, but brands too.
Also, anyone who is changing your U-Joints, we'd like to you to cut open your bad U-Joint just as people have done with Oil Filters to confirm or deny good performance.
Cut it open, take pictures of it and post them up in this thread. Also document as much information you have that you KNOW to be correct. Like how many miles are on them, what brand they are, if they are Greaseable or NON Greaseable, what year, make and model of vehicle they came off of and their position on the vehicle, whether it be rear shaft at the rear end, or rear driveshaft at the transmission bolt on yoke etc. Just include as much information as you KNOW for a fact about the U-Joint.