Narrow front control arms

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Hu99erorange

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Posts
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
First Name
Corey
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Hi all,
Is there by chance a factory control arm from another GM vehicle that will bolt on and give me a narrower front track width on a square body?
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,410
Reaction score
28,210
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I'm not aware of anything.

What's the reason for a narrower track?
 

Hu99erorange

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Posts
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
First Name
Corey
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
I have a bagged 57 panel on a 74 frame and am looking for options to tuck it better without a crazy offset wheel.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,410
Reaction score
28,210
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Oh cool! Got any pictures?
 

theblindchicken

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
1,518
Reaction score
265
Location
SoCal
First Name
Christian
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K10 5" lift + 2" BL
Engine Size
350-4, 0.030" over
Not anything that I'm aware of. With deep offset rims, you may have issues with contacting the frame before reaching lock-to-lock.
 

fussfeld

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Posts
340
Reaction score
54
Location
east coast
First Name
j
Truck Year
83
Truck Model
c-10
Engine Size
4.3 v-6 262CID
i want to take an outside guess and say that an s-10/g-body arms might work with some drilling required in the frame and crossmember, so it might not be 100% bolt on, but pretty "simple" and straightforward.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,410
Reaction score
28,210
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Also, that looks like an awesome project!
 

Big Chip

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Posts
4,656
Reaction score
6,734
Location
Michigan
First Name
Kevin
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
C35
Engine Size
454
Very cool rig!
 

SDJunkMan

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
1,809
Reaction score
2,656
Location
Black Hills of South Dakota
First Name
Jeff
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Sweet project. I've always wanted a 50's panel. Why did you go with a squarebody frame? It seems like most guys use a S10 or do a Nova/Camero front stub. I have a 57 shortbed stepside that I hope to start building some day.
 

theblindchicken

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
1,518
Reaction score
265
Location
SoCal
First Name
Christian
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K10 5" lift + 2" BL
Engine Size
350-4, 0.030" over
Sweet project. I've always wanted a 50's panel. Why did you go with a squarebody frame? It seems like most guys use a S10 or do a Nova/Camero front stub. I have a 57 shortbed stepside that I hope to start building some day.
Probably availability and maybe being a stronger chassis for a full size truck?
 

Hu99erorange

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Posts
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
First Name
Corey
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Sweet project. I've always wanted a 50's panel. Why did you go with a squarebody frame? It seems like most guys use a S10 or do a Nova/Camero front stub. I have a 57 shortbed stepside that I hope to start building some day.
S-10 frames are too narrow for 55-59. They work great on earlier trucks. I chose this frame because it was available for a good price.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,084
Posts
949,072
Members
36,164
Latest member
Norm310
Top