Huck's daily - 2005 Z71 crewcab

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TotalyHucked

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Posts
4,085
Reaction score
13,402
Location
Auburn, Georgia
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Sierra 1500
Engine Size
5.3
Here's a video I took last night. I'm stretching my arm back to hold the phone over roughly where the bottom of the rear seats are (they're folded down so you can hear more). I'm rolling slow and then accelerate to roughly 20-25mph here and start playing with the throttle, you can hear it come and go.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

legopnuematic

Licensed Junk Dealer
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Posts
2,881
Reaction score
7,816
Location
MO
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1971, 1̶9̶7̶4, 1976, 1979,1̶9̶8̶5, 2002
Truck Model
Dart Swinger, Sierra 10, C10 Cheyenne, C10 Big Ten, Silverado 10, Ram 2500
Engine Size
225/6, 350 c.i., 350 c.i., 5.9l Cummins
I wonder if you ran into a “false positive” sort of situation.

Your early/initial setup(s) did not appear to be wildly off, visually at least.

Looking back at my notes from the 14b sf I did, started at .02, it was decent, went to .03 was clearly deep, went to .025 was still clearly deep, went all the way down to .015, was clearly shallow. I can recall exactly, but think ended up back at .02 as the final setup that provided the best pattern. I’ll dig up the pictures showing that.

Point I’m getting at here is that on that setup within ±.005 of the final setup showed clear shallow and deep patterns, so .01, whereas you have gone way farther than that and it really hasn’t gone clear shallow or deep if that makes sense.

Which is for me where the confusion begins. But what I’m not sure of, is if the relationship between the diameter and tooth counts of the ring and pinion make any significant impact on the “slope” or rate of change. For example does a 3.07 gear sets pattern move “faster” or slower with a .003 change in pinion depth than a 4.88, assuming everything else is good and backlash held as a constant. Or do is there no difference at all or one that’s small enough to be a non factor.

Just more thinking out loud than anything here.
 

TotalyHucked

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Posts
4,085
Reaction score
13,402
Location
Auburn, Georgia
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Sierra 1500
Engine Size
5.3
All good points. Maybe 4.88s just move much slower/less with changes because of the thickness of the ring gear. That's probably why I kept chasing and ended up so far away from the "normal" range of pinion shims people tend to see setting these things up, I never had an "oh crap, that's too deep" or "oh crap that's too shallow" moment. It was always just a change, was never really a clear direction of the change. Granted not many people are putting such a deep gear in either. My buddy that does alot of these (usually 3.55-4.10) says 20s/30s is typically where he lands for the pinion shim. He's 2hrs away and his business is insanely busy right now or I would've already had him come help me.

My coworker was pretty adamant that he doesn't feel it's awful and to keep driving it and see what happens. He's done a handful of 10-bolts and several Mopar 8 3/4 or 8 1/4s over the years. I'm not sure I have a good feeling about doing that, so I think I'm gonna go back to that .029 setup (especially now that I know better about thinning the compound down and spinning it with a drill) and try again from there. I think I'd eventually adjusted to a .026 PS when I drove it the first time. Like I said when I drove that setup, it had a very light rotational sound that I now think was probably just the tight section of the ring gear, that I have now flipped 180*
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,768
Posts
967,708
Members
37,500
Latest member
TrickerTreater
Top