Squarebody on a Duramax frame

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Zach Painter

Junior Member
Joined
May 12, 2019
Posts
5
Reaction score
3
Location
Stanley Va
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Anyone here done a body swap to a Duramax frame? Looking to do one with my 83 and curios as to what needs to be done for body mounts.
 

Charlie

Mopar by Birth. Chevy by Choice.
Joined
Aug 2, 2017
Posts
1,837
Reaction score
912
Location
Euless, Texas
First Name
Don
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Cheyenne 10 LWB
Engine Size
350/TH350/AC/4 BBL Quadrajet
:welcome:
 

roundhouse

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2014
Posts
669
Reaction score
527
Location
atlanta ga
First Name
justin
Truck Year
77,78,79,80 ?
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I’ve never done it but I would predict the Body mounts will be the easiest problem to solve

All the wiring and computer and harness mods are going to be the real headache
 

shiftpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Posts
4,855
Reaction score
6,092
Location
BC Canada
First Name
shiftpro
Truck Year
73-87
Truck Model
1500, 2500, 3500
Engine Size
350, 383, 454, 496!
It won't fit without completely redesigning the firewall... and floor.
Your frame is stronger anyway...
 

Matt69olds

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
3,819
Location
Central Indiana
First Name
Matt
Truck Year
81
Truck Model
GMC 1/2 ton
Engine Size
455 Olds
I bet the new fully boxed frames are far stronger than the old C channel frame, not to mention the ride quality would be much better. The biggest hassle I could see if trying to adapt the ABS and all the modern conveniences. I would imagine a body lift would solve most of the floorboard and firewall issues. I’m pretty sure Painless Wiring makes a wire harness with a PCM that will run the engine, I know I have seen them for the Cummins.

Unless you could figure out how to keep all the advantages of the newer frame under the classic body, I’d swap the engine into the older frame. Less headaches. Maybe someone has already done what your attempting. I think it would be badass if done, all the modern advantages with the classic body looks
 

roundhouse

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2014
Posts
669
Reaction score
527
Location
atlanta ga
First Name
justin
Truck Year
77,78,79,80 ?
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
You try typing
“Duramax squarebody”
in google or DuckDuckGo ?

Why anyone would want a zillion expensive sensors and a expensive computers on a old pickup , I don’t know , but here ya go .

I’d use a 12 valve Cummins and a five speed.
cheaper ,easier and more reliable with no computer

Using a dmax isn’t keeping it GM since GM was not capable of designing or manufacturing a new diesel and had to pay Isuzu in Japan to do it for them

I’d also start with a K-30 frame .
Noticeably stronger than the K10 or 20 frame

But if you put those retarded giant rims on it ......

https://www.dieselarmy.com/features/car-features/the-perfect-swap-lml-duramax-swapped-1986-gmc/


https://www.google.com/amp/blog.cal...fitted-with-a-built-640hp-duramax?hs_amp=true

https://www.steelsoldiers.com/showthread.php?178733-Duramax-Diesel-Engine-Conversion-Kit
 
Last edited:

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,192
Reaction score
8,030
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
When I went to Barrett Jackson in Scottsdale last year I saw the most awesome, beautiful truck I ever imagined. A crew cab, shortbed K20 (87 I believe) with a 2014 duramax/Allison trans. All the interior was swapped over including dash and leather seats. It looked factory original. Black on black. The literature said it had a one off frame built by one of the well known chassis shops. I don't know what the cost in dollars and time was but the point is it can be done. It's just how bad you want it.
 

Craig 85

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Posts
3,917
Reaction score
4,116
Location
Nashville, TN
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K30 SRW
Engine Size
454/TH-400/NP205
Here's a You Tube video of a guy making the swap.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

DoubleDingo

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
11,250
Reaction score
17,177
Location
Right where I am
First Name
Bagoomba
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
81-C20 Silverado Camper Special-TH400-4.10s
Engine Size
Carb'ed Vortec 350
I'd put a 60's Series truck body on a Square Frame before I went the route you're considering.
 

Zach Painter

Junior Member
Joined
May 12, 2019
Posts
5
Reaction score
3
Location
Stanley Va
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
You try typing
“Duramax squarebody”
in google or DuckDuckGo ?

Why anyone would want a zillion expensive sensors and a expensive computers on a old pickup , I don’t know , but here ya go .

I’d use a 12 valve Cummins and a five speed.
cheaper ,easier and more reliable with no computer

Using a dmax isn’t keeping it GM since GM was not capable of designing or manufacturing a new diesel and had to pay Isuzu in Japan to do it for them

I’d also start with a K-30 frame .
Noticeably stronger than the K10 or 20 frame

But if you put those retarded giant rims on it ......

https://www.dieselarmy.com/features/car-features/the-perfect-swap-lml-duramax-swapped-1986-gmc/


https://www.google.com/amp/blog.calibratedpower.com/blog/85-square-body-fitted-with-a-built-640hp-duramax?hs_amp=true

https://www.steelsoldiers.com/showthread.php?178733-Duramax-Diesel-Engine-Conversion-Kit



I don’t like dodge, not doing the swap “to keep it gm”. If that’s your reasoning then powerstroke isn’t Ford and Cummins isn’t dodge since neither of those 2 made their own. Ford finally did in 2011 but still.
 

Zach Painter

Junior Member
Joined
May 12, 2019
Posts
5
Reaction score
3
Location
Stanley Va
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I bet the new fully boxed frames are far stronger than the old C channel frame, not to mention the ride quality would be much better. The biggest hassle I could see if trying to adapt the ABS and all the modern conveniences. I would imagine a body lift would solve most of the floorboard and firewall issues. I’m pretty sure Painless Wiring makes a wire harness with a PCM that will run the engine, I know I have seen them for the Cummins.

Unless you could figure out how to keep all the advantages of the newer frame under the classic body, I’d swap the engine into the older frame. Less headaches. Maybe someone has already done what your attempting. I think it would be badass if done, all the modern advantages with the classic body looks



Duramax tuner has an 85 that’s sitting on a 2003 chassis. Trying to see how they went about it but no answer from them yet.
 

roundhouse

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2014
Posts
669
Reaction score
527
Location
atlanta ga
First Name
justin
Truck Year
77,78,79,80 ?
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I don’t like dodge, not doing the swap “to keep it gm”. If that’s your reasoning then powerstroke isn’t Ford and Cummins isn’t dodge since neither of those 2 made their own. Ford finally did in 2011 but still.


The 6BT was designed by Cummins to be used in excavators
And it’s in a lot of boats too
The marine pump and injectors is a nice upgrade
At least dodge was the only one to not act like it was their own engine
And the NV 4500 was also used in Chevys

I think everyone knows what happened when ford designed their own engine
The 6.0 disaster

For the poster worried about the ABS and stuff

All that is going to stay just like it is with the late model chassis
It’s just getting a old body dropped on
Changing or modifying the floor and firewall isn’t that hard if you have a good quality mig welder and practice a little

Hot rodders have been modifying floors since the 40s
To Channel a body lower onto a frame

I’ve modified several to fit a transmission or T-case that wasn’t factory
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,167
Posts
950,743
Members
36,282
Latest member
Doug Hampton
Top