Spreadbore to squarebore adapter

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Old60Driver

1983 K20 Silverado
Joined
May 17, 2020
Posts
245
Reaction score
306
Location
Houston
First Name
Michael
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K20 Silverado
Engine Size
350
So I recently upgraded my cam/heads/intake on my '83 K20. Nothing crazy, 906 heads, Summit 1103 cam, Summit 226062 intake. I've got a crappy Amazon special HEI dizzy that is coming all in WAY to early that I'll be changing soon, but that's a different post. lol Overall, she's running pretty good, with a noticeable increase in power, especially above 2 grand.

So, when I picked up a set of non cracked 906 heads, I needed a new vortec intake. Snagged up a Summit special (see pic), and figured I was good to go. UNTIL, I realized I bought a square bore intake and I planned on running my Qjet. No worries, I'll just snag a spacer. So I picked up an open type spacer (2nd pic). It all fit together with no problems, and no vacuum leaks have been found with a spray test.

Here's the question. Am I loosing any low end power by using this type of spacer? I'd prefer one that keeps the planes separate (am I saying that right?), but can't seem to locate what I'm looking for, except for this Spectre kit (3rd pic) from the local parts store.

So, my questions are:
Do I really need to worry about the 'type' of spacer? Am I really losing torque down low using it?
Will the Spectre spacer be better than the one I currently have (open)? It's only 30 bucks, so I guess I could snag on it, and test, but I thought I'd put it out there to some QJet gurus, and see what y'all think.

And I know, I know! I should have bought the right intake, but here we are! lol


Thanks in advance y'all, and happy cruisin!


You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
5,595
Reaction score
9,108
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I'm a believer in keeping dual plane manifolds dual plane,which an open hole adapter doesn't do. I put up two screen shots, one from lunatis website,1 from I think it was Edelbrock If I was dead set on running an adapter,I'd be using the edelbrock adapter. I've seen them as cheap as 20.00 new.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2024-06-08_103328.jpg
    Screenshot_2024-06-08_103328.jpg
    77.2 KB · Views: 31
  • Screenshot_2024-06-08_103316.jpg
    Screenshot_2024-06-08_103316.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 32

82sbshortbed

Fuckemall!!
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
15,964
Reaction score
53,763
Location
SE Texas
First Name
Doug
Truck Year
1982, 1984
Truck Model
1500 shortbed, 1500 longbed
Engine Size
454, 305
I used this adapter on my 454 so I could mount the quadrajet on the intake and it works great! No power loss at all. Actually like it way better than the edelbrock that was on it before. If anything it's more responsive and runs better.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Old60Driver

1983 K20 Silverado
Joined
May 17, 2020
Posts
245
Reaction score
306
Location
Houston
First Name
Michael
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K20 Silverado
Engine Size
350
Hey y'all!

I couldn't find a dual plane adapter, so I made one. Basically, cut a notch in my existing adapter (like the one that 82sbshortbed posted), and slapped in a piece of aluminum flatbar. I didn't really need to, but I RTV'd the slots after I inserted the flat bar. The change in performance was definitely noticeable! I hadn't changed anything else, and it just seemed to come off idle faster.

Just my .02, your results may vary. ;)

Happy crusin!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,411
Posts
956,911
Members
36,728
Latest member
jdickson
Top