Removing a leaf from a spring pack...which one?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,194
Reaction score
8,034
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
I'm adding 3 degree shims to my rear springs. The pins they sent with them are the same length (4 inch) as what is currently in the spring pack and won't be long enough with the shim. No big deal as I have been wanting to remove a leaf to "unstiffen" the ride slightly. That will solve the pin issue but which leaf is the correct one to remove? Obviously not the top or bottom but I would think the shorter ones on the bottom would have more an effect on overall stiffness?
 
Last edited:

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,882
Reaction score
9,148
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Depends.

The shorter ones at the bottom may be "overload" springs, that is, if they are thick and flat then they do not engage until the truck is really loaded. If that is the case then they are basically "spacers" of the thickness in the middle.

Any above that that match the curve are actually affecting your ride stiffness at curb weight.

K
 

Redfish

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
2,662
Reaction score
14,316
Location
Prairieville, LA
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
350/5.7
I'm adding 3 degree shims to my rear springs. The pins they sent with them are the same length (4 inch) as what is currently in the spring pack and won't be long enough with the shim. No big deal as I have been wanting to remove a leaf to "unstiffen" the ride slightly. That will solve the pin issue but which leaf is the correct one to remove? Obviously not the top or bottom but I would think the shorter ones on the bottom would have more an effect on overall stiffness?
I removed the bottom leaf, the shortest leaf in the stack when I modified my front springs. I agonized over that decision...it worked out okay for what I was trying to accomplish. In my case I had to shorten the bolt/pin afterwards. I wanted to get the nose level with, or slightly lower than the rear. It had a very slight "squat" which was NOT acceptable to me.


My Skyjacker SoftRide springs came with 5 leaf springs:

You must be registered for see images attach




The stack all apart:

You must be registered for see images attach
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,194
Reaction score
8,034
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Update. Removed the bottom leaf above the overload leaf and replaced with the 3 degree ORD shim. That corrected the pinion angle since the new driveline is a CV. Ride height stayed exactly the same and the ride is noticably smoother. A good day!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230526_101210211.jpg
    IMG_20230526_101210211.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 93
  • IMG_20230526_101218624_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20230526_101218624_HDR.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 93

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
6,980
Reaction score
12,236
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
^You got a slip yoke at the back? Never seen that before. Is that OE or?
How much of a lift are you correcting for with the beveled shim?
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,194
Reaction score
8,034
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
^You got a slip yoke at the back? Never seen that before. Is that OE or?
How much of a lift are you correcting for with the beveled shim?
Yep. I've seen trucks with the slip on the axle end. Most of the custom trucks and rails that swarm the sand dunes are like that. Usually it's used with a Double Carden on the other end. I only have a two inch lift due to the rancho springs to PO put on. The issue was switching from a u joint to the CV. CV points the pinion directly at the front output unlike the 3 degree offset when using stock joint. In short, needed 3* shims.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230519_171427702.jpg
    IMG_20230519_171427702.jpg
    91.3 KB · Views: 86
  • IMG_20230519_160408301.jpg
    IMG_20230519_160408301.jpg
    74.2 KB · Views: 82
  • IMG_20230519_171357959.jpg
    IMG_20230519_171357959.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 73

Wallace6

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2023
Posts
144
Reaction score
77
Location
Wyoming
First Name
Ray
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
I have never seen that ds orientation ever unless someone put that drive shaft on backwards. I would love to be corrected but if that were the case im sure they would have made a slip yoke at the axle instead of the t-case in the later models lol. Sorry drive shaft is in backwards
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,304
Reaction score
1,859
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350
Front drive shafts with a factory style flat flange on the transfer case have the slip yoke at the axle and double cardan at the transfer case.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,194
Reaction score
8,034
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
I have never seen that ds orientation ever unless someone put that drive shaft on backwards. I would love to be corrected but if that were the case im sure they would have made a slip yoke at the axle instead of the t-case in the later models lol. Sorry drive shaft is in backwards
You honestly think the slip joint cares where it's at? I may be wrong but I have yet to see a "later" model with a slip joint shaft. Name one model that has a fixed yoke on the t-case? Thats like stressing over which direction to install a shower curtain rod. lol
 
Last edited:

Wallace6

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2023
Posts
144
Reaction score
77
Location
Wyoming
First Name
Ray
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
You certainly can install it either way obviously and it won't matter. I have worked on several of these and never seen a rear ds installed in that direction.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,447
Reaction score
28,357
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
You certainly can install it either way obviously and it won't matter. I have worked on several of these and never seen a rear ds installed in that direction.

It can be beneficial to install it that way on a truck that actually goes off road. It allows for a little more ground clearance in front of the pumpkin and it's also a little stronger in that area if it does come in contact with logs, rocks, etc.
 

Buck69

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2023
Posts
227
Reaction score
293
Location
Northern British Columbia
First Name
John
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
D30 CUCV
Engine Size
6.2 (removed)
You honestly think the slip joint cares where it's at? I may be wrong but I have yet to see a "later" model with a slip joint shaft. Name one model that has a fixed yoke on the t-case? Thats like stressing over which direction to install a shower curtain rod. lol
I think the slip should be away from the shower head to keep the water out when things get exciting in there....
 
Top