Rear shackle angle

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Charlie Kleman

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2019
Posts
72
Reaction score
51
Location
Johnstown, PA
First Name
Charlie
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7 350
Got my 14 bolt underneath the blazer yesterday. I’m running 56” springs in the rear and using an ORD shackle flip kit. In my laziness I tried mounting the brackets backwards to see how the shackle angle looked vs drilling new holes. By flipping the brackets side to side i figured its not that far off from moving them back 4” on the correct side. I know there’s many variables that go into shackle angle just wondering what anyone’s thoughts were on this.
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

nvrenuf

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Posts
1,981
Reaction score
2,522
Location
Mobile, Al.
First Name
John
Truck Year
1991
Truck Model
K5
Engine Size
454
I’m no suspension expert but it looks ok to me. I’m running 56’s w/ ORD 2.5” shackle flips (swap sides like you) and my shackle angle is similar. My set up hasn’t shown any issues and works well.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Charlie Kleman

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2019
Posts
72
Reaction score
51
Location
Johnstown, PA
First Name
Charlie
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7 350
Thanks! I didn’t think it looked too bad but I wanted someone else to say it too haha
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,229
Reaction score
8,121
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
So now when the spring compresses the shackle moves forward. In doing so, it's gonna lift the truck because of the pivot point location. Will it matter? Not if you don't know any better.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,595
Reaction score
28,796
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Looks pretty good to me. That angle is about what I would shoot for personally.

Also, swapping them side to side ain't lazy... it's simply doing things the right way :)
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,595
Reaction score
28,796
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
So now when the spring compresses the shackle moves forward. In doing so, it's gonna lift the truck because of the pivot point location. Will it matter? Not if you don't know any better.

Say what now?

When the spring compresses, it will move the shackle to a more horizontal position, not vertical.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,229
Reaction score
8,121
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Say what now?

When the spring compresses, it will move the shackle to a more horizontal position, not vertical.
Lol. I was just looking at the photos again and I agree because of the springs arch. I went thru something similar on my D60 on the front but it had flat springs and bends the other way. My bad.
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,343
Reaction score
1,944
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350
Looks good to me. Smart to swap sides and use existig holes in the frame.
 

89GMCJimmy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
101
Reaction score
61
Location
90245
First Name
ivan
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
Would you want it to be angled back as opposed to 90°
You must be registered for see images attach
 

89GMCJimmy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
101
Reaction score
61
Location
90245
First Name
ivan
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
Does the shackle flip require that
I was told the stock shackle should be as close to 90° as possible.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,595
Reaction score
28,796
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Would you want it to be angled back as opposed to 90°
You must be registered for see images attach

Your angle seems to be fine as well. Tension shackle works a bit different than the compression shackle shown above.
 

Blazerbiker

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Posts
13
Reaction score
23
Location
Rifle CO
First Name
Stephen
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
K5, actually a Jimmy since it's a GMC
Engine Size
504in
It's too steep. Or rather, it's less than optimum. The feel you'll get it that the spring will get really stiff when it goes flat. These trucks can and will have a couple inches of travel in reverse arch and a really steep shackle angle robs you of that travel. We've played with this and you can make the suspension lock out when the spring is flat where a less severe shackle angle will let it move into a reverse arch freely. The overload starts adding a bunch of rate when the spring goes flat and when you combine it with some shackled "binding" it gets way worse.

The effect is from the spring needing to pull the spring eyes closer together as it compresses past flat. As this happens, the shackle has to stand up and the longer the shackle is and the more laid down it is, the more you're picking up the truck to make this happen. This translates to skyrocketing spring rates which make the movement not happen.

What you have "doesn't not work" but it can be better. Giving up compression travel past flat is OK when your spring is done working when it's flat like one of our 4" lift tension shackle rear springs with 12" of arch but you're not in that situation.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,396
Posts
956,494
Members
36,696
Latest member
charliesquarehed
Top