Bextreme04
Full Access Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Posts
- 4,439
- Reaction score
- 5,581
- Location
- Oregon
- First Name
- Eric
- Truck Year
- 1980
- Truck Model
- K25
- Engine Size
- 350-4bbl
1. Thats M.E. vs M.E.T. (DOWN WITH THE M.E.'s)
2. Another engineers fault, just not the one who drew the starter assembly.
3. Paper theory and bean counters
Im really jusy here to start **** because i happen to like you, and you stated youre an engineer
Not wrong... the worst thing is having 50 parts to an assembly that all work perfectly by themselves and no chance of working at all together. Its getting more and more common in the modern world of standards based requirements.
Its similar to software that does EXACTLY what you told it to do... which is nothing like what you meant for it to do.
I can't tell you how many times i've talked to someone about a design and then asked them "what do you do when that thing breaks?" and their, no ****, response is "it won't break". I have never in my whole life seen a component that "wont break". Some things may last longer than others, but eventually some poor sucker is gonna have to put their dick beaters on it and replace it.
Without reading the whole thing, idk man, it sure sounds malicious to me!!!! infact, its personal. you thought "lets **** with her" when designing something far before i was alive
I'll go with maliciously lazy..... they just didn't care that it was going to be inconvenient for anyone needing to work on it later.