Question on tire size for an '85 K20...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

7900_Blazer

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Posts
166
Reaction score
120
Location
Texas
First Name
Francis
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
Blazer
Engine Size
350
Purchased an '85 K20... my daughter wants it to be her daily... all original.. needs some work of course.

Two questions:

1. Do these trucks benefit from a leaf-spring upgrade in the front to level the stance?

The 'natural' stance of these trucks seems to be 'high' in the rear - I'm assuming so that when you hook up a trailer it will be a bit more leveled out??? Also, the fronts do seem to have the slightest 'reverse' arch which makes it sit a bit lower... not sure if that is normal or just worn out sprints after 37 years.

2. What tire size can I go with without having to upgrade the springs all the way around?

I'm looking at either a 285/70 R16 (33" tire) or a 265/70 R16 (31" tire)...

Thoughts on either of these tires? Will they fit without a spring upgrade?

I'd like it to 'stand' a bit taller than it does now.
You must be registered for see images attach
 
Last edited:

FireTruck1984

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
2,988
Reaction score
9,946
Location
Michigan
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1984 and 1984
Truck Model
High Sierra K1500 350. Sierra Classic C1500 305.
Engine Size
350, 305
Yes the reverse arch is normal for front leafs on the K20.
I hope you’d consider keeping the steel wheels and caps, that’s a very popular look these days. A taller side wall is also the way to go. Here’s an 85 r16
You must be registered for see images attach
 
  • Like
Reactions: WFO

Dutch Rutter

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Posts
1,081
Reaction score
1,232
Location
Independence, Or
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7
@7900_Blazer

My 83 k20 has 305/70 r16s and is on a 2" lift. The front springs are either aftermarket or have been re-arched by one of the previous owners. I also have ORD's HD shackles up front which give it 3/4 inch more up front. I have not yet had any rubbing even offroad. But I'm sure its pretty close at some points when twisted up good.

I wouldn't try a 33 with complete stock suspension and any offroad use in its future, strictly street use might be fine. If it were mine, and I wasent going to change any suspension, I'd go with the 31 or even a 32 OD tire.

Edit: to answer your questions.

New front leaf springs will always be an improvement over clapped out/sagged out factory springs.

It is possible that you could change out only the front springs to level it out more, and add more tire. That way you wouldn't have to change the rear springs, add blocks, or a flip kit to match.
 

Attachments

  • 20211218_120547.jpg
    20211218_120547.jpg
    118 KB · Views: 220

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,230
Reaction score
8,124
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
@7900_Blazer

My 83 k20 has 305/70 r16s and is on a 2" lift. The front springs are either aftermarket or have been re-arched by one of the previous owners. I also have ORD's HD shackles up front which give it 3/4 inch more up front. I have not yet had any rubbing even offroad. But I'm sure its pretty close at some points when twisted up good.

I wouldn't try a 33 with complete stock suspension and any offroad use in its future, strictly street use might be fine. If it were mine, and I wasent going to change any suspension, I'd go with the 31 or even a 32 OD tire.

Edit: to answer your questions.

New front leaf springs will always be an improvement over clapped out/sagged out factory springs.

It is possible that you could change out only the front springs to level it out more, and add more tire. That way you wouldn't have to change the rear springs, add blocks, or a flip kit to match.
That's a good looking rig DR!
 

Catbox

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Posts
4,473
Reaction score
16,797
Location
Just Outside of Portland Oregon
First Name
Peter
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
C20 Silverado Camper Special
Engine Size
461
While I am not a 4wd truck, we run around on a set of 265/75/16's with no issues of rubbing at all at stock 3/4 ton ride height.
These are 31.5" tires.
Just so you have an idea.
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Dutch Rutter

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Posts
1,081
Reaction score
1,232
Location
Independence, Or
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7
That's a good looking rig DR!

Thank you sir! Of course it was just washed in that picture.

Almost sold it a few months back TBH. Glad I didn't.
But now the trans is making some awful noise (I've been expecting it to) so that's going to need addressed this month or next.
 

68post

very, VERY, limited access member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Posts
281
Reaction score
97
Location
Indianapolis
First Name
Tim
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
84 K30 SRW Silverado, 85 C20 C6P
Engine Size
454, TBD
Your rim width, if wider than stock, will have an effect on what rubs. 33's on a ten inch rim will hit the back of the front fender on a K30, I can hear mine touch with new springs, 1" zero rates, and ORD HD shackles (extra 1/2"). My rims are 10" tho' and 305 tire size, 285's fit better - especially on a narrower rim. 265's fit on a 10" rim, but it's too much rim width.
 

7900_Blazer

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Posts
166
Reaction score
120
Location
Texas
First Name
Francis
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
Blazer
Engine Size
350
@7900_Blazer

My 83 k20 has 305/70 r16s and is on a 2" lift. The front springs are either aftermarket or have been re-arched by one of the previous owners. I also have ORD's HD shackles up front which give it 3/4 inch more up front. I have not yet had any rubbing even offroad. But I'm sure its pretty close at some points when twisted up good.

I wouldn't try a 33 with complete stock suspension and any offroad use in its future, strictly street use might be fine. If it were mine, and I wasent going to change any suspension, I'd go with the 31 or even a 32 OD tire.

Edit: to answer your questions.

New front leaf springs will always be an improvement over clapped out/sagged out factory springs.

It is possible that you could change out only the front springs to level it out more, and add more tire. That way you wouldn't have to change the rear springs, add blocks, or a flip kit to match.
Love your truck!... I think 307/70's are ... 35's right?
 

Dutch Rutter

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Posts
1,081
Reaction score
1,232
Location
Independence, Or
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7
Love your truck!... I think 307/70's are ... 35's right?

Thanks. They measure out to be 32.8 overall so a 33 just wider then a 285/75r16. When I bought these, I was trying to get the narrower 285s but the tire shop had these on hand and the 285s would have been a 4-8 week wait.

Side note: these Falken Wildpeak ATW3 have been a fantastic tire.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,098
Reaction score
7,806
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
315-75-16s are a "nominal" 35" tire
Yep a metric 35. By the math it calculates to a 34.6, but it could be more or less.

I learned from a tire guy that most tires are labeled based on OD including tread now. Whereas in the past, a 35” tire was based on the carcass dimension. Just like gatorades, they keep on shrinking. Keep the price the same, but shrink the product. Sly way of raising the price.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
7,090
Reaction score
12,472
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
Yep a metric 35. By the math it calculates to a 34.6, but it could be more or less.

I learned from a tire guy that most tires are labeled based on OD including tread now. Whereas in the past, a 35” tire was based on the carcass dimension. Just like gatorades, they keep on shrinking. Keep the price the same, but shrink the product. Sly way of raising the price.
Interesting. I didn’t know sizes used to be before the tread thickness.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,098
Reaction score
7,806
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Interesting. I didn’t know sizes used to be before the tread thickness.
Neither did I, but I don’t know a whole lot about tires either. I’m still learning. I just ordered a set of Nitto Ridge grapplers in 35x12.50-18 F2 load range. The guy at America’s Tire told me at the time about the measurement of a tire’s OD. He mentioned there are a few companies that still measure the old way such as Maxxis and TSL.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,416
Posts
957,113
Members
36,752
Latest member
78 squarebody
Top