I personally have never messed with a 6L80, but the stamped steel carriers and clutch housing tells me all I need to know about them.
Compare the flimsy stamped steel stuff to the machined steel carriers of the 400/4L80. It’s a night and day difference.
Agree 100%
It takes a metric ton of effort (upgrades, updates, corrective measures) to get a 6L80 to anywhere near as capable as a 4L80E in terms of durability/reliability, IMO.
To All contemplating an auto swap and considering one of those two transmissions:
Here's my short 4L80E list of things that make it handle 600 hp without breaking a sweat:
1) dual feed direct clutch internally
2) rollerize rear of the case
3) shim planets and fwd hub-direct drum as needed
4) Sonnax LB4L80 boost valve
5) Drill plate per application
6) Rollerized billet or forged fwd hub (ive even done 4L80es that have the stock piece and survive at 550-650 hp S/S applications)
7 A518 direct clutch snap ring (.088-.110, depending) for intermediate clutch
8) high rate return springs in direct clutch (and int if necessary) {.050 bleeder hole in dir drum if rpms 5500+ routinely}
9) block-off plate for 3rd and 4th acc if application calls for it
10) choice lube mods
11) sleeve forward drum (sleeves are $5 or so)
12) set end play (front/rear) per spec - i run everything on the tighter side of spec (6Ls were designed to not have end play adjustable and many come in sloppy)
Apart from the billet rollerized forward hubs, all the stuff listed adds up to less than $100
Here's
my list for the 6L80, just to get it to the point of reliablilty, lol - folks will need to spend even more for 4L80E-like strength and torque handling capacity.
I actually enjoy working on the 6L transmissions but they (other than perhaps the 6L90 w/the performance converters) were designed to max fuel economy whereas the 4L80 was designed for max durability. Lots of design and materials compromises made w/the 6L80 as a result...
My .02 (or maybe .05)