Thoughts Needed Please

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
9,108
Reaction score
15,456
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
I recently purchased a yukon posi (DuraGrip) for the 8.5" 30 spline 10 bolt.

I went to install last night, only to find standard I.D. carrier bearings (1.625) dont fit, the Yukon Uses like, 1.781" ID bearings, so the hub might be close to 45mm.


Those bearings im having a kinda hard time finding, and naturally they are offered thru yukon.

Apparently, the large hub bearing is just a "thing" to accomodate aftermarket carriers (auburn, detroit, etc)

So its some marketing gimmick im assume.


Anyone see a reason i can't just chuck the yukon up in the lathe and turn the journals down to the appropriate press fit size for plain old standard 1.625" I.D. carrier bearings like ALL stock carriers use, i had to put the axke back together last night unfortunately, but i DID find the sourcr of my whining, and it was what i thought. The large inside pinion bearing and its race took some damage from the fall when the truck fell off of the lift, replaced that, set everything back up, and presto, the rear end doesnt whine anymore.


Please let me know your thoughts in turning the journals on my yukon. It is 10x easier, and faster to do that and go to any parts store and purchase the standard carrier bearings vs wait ANOTHER week AND drive on a welded rear end. Im getting sick of it. It sucks.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Itali83

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Posts
575
Reaction score
1,079
Location
Maine
First Name
Ben
Truck Year
1982, 1987, 1987
Truck Model
K10, 'burban C10, Jimmy
Engine Size
350, 6.2, 350
I’d turn it without thinking twice. You’re only talking .156” roughly you need to turn which is only .078” of material off the thickness of the bearing seat. Turn it and send it.

ben
 

dvdswan

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Posts
2,366
Reaction score
2,038
Location
Port Orchard, WA
First Name
Dave
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
This^^^. I was thinking the same thing.
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
9,108
Reaction score
15,456
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
I’d turn it without thinking twice. You’re only talking .156” roughly you need to turn which is only .078” of material off the thickness of the bearing seat. Turn it and send it.

ben
This^^^. I was thinking the same thing.


Ok, thanks.
My life has been a total disaster lately, and i just wanted some sane, logical opinions on the topic just as a confirmation. I personally saw nothing wrong with it, i just wanted to be sure.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,098
Reaction score
7,805
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
I wonder if there’s a difference in alloy being the reason for more material being used?
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,464
Reaction score
5,630
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
I wonder if there’s a difference in alloy being the reason for more material being used?

I was thinking either the engineers used a different alloy or they wanted more safety margin because they assumed you were using more bald eagles and were going to be hooking up the rear end more. For your application I don't think it would make a bit of difference to just turn it down to the standard size bearing.
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
9,108
Reaction score
15,456
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
I wonder if there’s a difference in alloy being the reason for more material being used?


It appears to be a a better casting than the OEM carrier , some sort of steel vs cast iron
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,401
Posts
956,720
Members
36,714
Latest member
MartinK5
Top