Do you not like where it is sitting now height wise? I think the front looks good personally. I'd put a drop shackle on the back to get it down another inch an roll with it.
Fyi Western Chassis an POL are the same company now. It stinks because western used to have an awesome sales/support team. POL has always been difficult to deal with imo.
I do like the look, but didn't expect the front to be so low. I guess I didn't realize only 3 1/2" would lower it that much. I know you mentioned that both generations of C-10's use the same coil spring, but I'm curious why POL and other places offer different part numbers and different prices. There is a $10 price difference on POL's site.
So yesterday, I pulled the front tires to take a better look at the coil and it appears the coil isn't properly seated in the pocket. As if it isn't large enough in diameter to fill the pocket. The "pocket" has built in ledges that conform to the shape of the coil and rises with the coil. I've thought about coil spacers or coil isolators that go in the pocket, below the coil, but I don't know if that'll work with these lower control arms and coils.
Is it possible the 63-72 coils are the same height, but not the same diameter as the 73-87?
Definitely will be calling POL Monday morning to ask about how these coils appear to fit in the LCA pockets.
Any thoughts out there?
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
