Small block 400

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

hirschdalechevy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Posts
726
Reaction score
517
Location
norcal
First Name
rich
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
k-30
Engine Size
454
Double hump heads were great back in the day , but if you are going the iron head route the vortec's are better , imo.

My girl's truck has a .030 over , 9.8 to 1 , 270 roller cammed 350 , with worked over 202 double hump heads on it and it hauls ass , but it's a little soft out the hole. We had the heads at the time so we used them. It's more of a street car motor , but it's fun to drive. Real coppy idle at the stop light , will still cut the tire's loose , and at 3,000 rpm look out all the way to 6500ish.I would have rather used vortec's but we had the double humps so we went for it.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

highdesertrange

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Posts
1,066
Reaction score
211
Location
kalifornia
First Name
mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
k30
Engine Size
454
no one addressed the over bore of the Siamese sleeves in the 400 having cooling issues. I don't mean like running around town or even doing 1/4 mile runs. I mean like actually working the truck, like pulling an 8,000lb trailer up a 20 mile grade. imo 400ci were never good bored if you ever planned to work it. highdesertranger
 

Linville33

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Posts
204
Reaction score
3
Location
Clinton, IA
First Name
Justin
Truck Year
83
Truck Model
K20 Scotsdale
Engine Size
SBC 400
Alright that's what I figured. Technology has come a long way since then. I'm debating between the vortec or aluminum route just gotta source the cash right now
 

Don5

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Posts
1,136
Reaction score
73
Location
West Virginia
First Name
Don
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
k15
Engine Size
350
Back in the day the 202's were the heads to have if you wanted performance. But now, I would go with a set of aluminum heads. You will get better results. You have to love technology.

As far as the overbore question. I would not go over .30 on the 400. I honestly think you might be able to go to .45 but I don't know how long that would hold up. The diameter of the bore would be very high on the list of things to check once you pull that engine out.

BTW-I love your daughter's truck Hirschdale! That is a good looking truck.
 

morrow07

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Posts
77
Reaction score
19
Location
San Mateo, Ca
First Name
Ryan
Truck Year
1977 - 1989
Truck Model
Cheyenne - V2500
Engine Size
406 - 350
.030 is fine for working the truck. My father in law went to 406ci in his 78, and that truck is strictly for work. Dump runs, lumber hauls, towing, etc. Stock cooling system seems to handle it fine.

Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,132
Reaction score
9,327
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
Are the double hump heads any good for these 400s? Buddies dad is an old school guy and was telling me how great the 202 double humps are/were. Don't know much about them

Vortecs are still better than double humps. Back in the day double humps were top dog, but not these days.

Yes, years ago double humps, camel humps, fulie and a few other names, WERE the ****. Not so much anymore. Even if you max ported them, you'll never get the flow out of them that you can get out of the Vortecs. Only thing the double humps are really good for these days are for the guys wanting to do # matching OEM restores. Then if you're getting into high lift and very high performance meaning the Vortecs are going to need extensive machine work, then you may as well just go with aftermarket aluminums ready to bolt on right out of the box.
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,782
Reaction score
1,020
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Are the double hump heads any good for these 400s? Buddies dad is an old school guy and was telling me how great the 202 double humps are/were. Don't know much about them

"Were" is right. They were great on 327s and 350s back in the day, but virtually ANY modern heads flow better, and you won't won't have to deal with 45-50-year old castings! Also, the chamber size (around 64 cc) is too small for a 400.

If you find a set of double humps, make them look pretty and hang them on the wall.:)
 

firebane

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Posts
1,732
Reaction score
30
Location
Calgary, AB
First Name
Curtis
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
"Were" is right. They were great on 327s and 350s back in the day, but virtually ANY modern heads flow better, and you won't won't have to deal with 45-50-year old castings! Also, the chamber size (around 64 cc) is too small for a 400.

If you find a set of double humps, make them look pretty and hang them on the wall.:)

Lets not forget that those older heads also need to be treated properly to be able to use the gas we have today as well as the valve seats can't take it.
 

Joe383

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Posts
133
Reaction score
7
Location
Moses Lake
First Name
Joseph
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
454
If it were me I would get a set of vortec heads and have them modified a little and swap over to new pistons and 5.7" rods. I just got done building a vortec motor a few months back and have a medium sized cam in my Camaro and it has torque like no other. I have not drove the car much sense the build due to the car needing other non motor related stuff but the motor has great bottom end. The vortecs are my favorite stock head. Do be warned though... I had to have mine modified to except new springs and it was not cheep. Every one told me stock size springs would drop in and they did not on mine. Had to have valve guide boss machined. If you went with a set of vortecs and something like the edelbrock performer cam for the 350 not there 400 grind it would have torque for days and drive like a stock motor. I have the 906 castings and the valve guide boss is .9" on these heads. You would have to also have any non 400 head machined with steam holes before using them on your motor. Another great head would be the aluminum L98 TPI heads if you can track down a set.
 

MadOgre

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Posts
4,090
Reaction score
51
Location
NA
First Name
NA
Truck Year
NA
Truck Model
NA
Engine Size
NA
Lets not forget that those older heads also need to be treated properly to be able to use the gas we have today as well as the valve seats can't take it.

Valve seats are metal and round and is a metal part of the head valve port. That is what the valve seats on to. Valve Seat. Not to be confused with Valve Seal :)
 

MadOgre

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Posts
4,090
Reaction score
51
Location
NA
First Name
NA
Truck Year
NA
Truck Model
NA
Engine Size
NA
Double hump heads were great back in the day , but if you are going the iron head route the vortec's are better , imo.

My girl's truck has a .030 over , 9.8 to 1 , 270 roller cammed 350 , with worked over 202 double hump heads on it and it hauls ass , but it's a little soft out the hole. We had the heads at the time so we used them. It's more of a street car motor , but it's fun to drive. Real coppy idle at the stop light , will still cut the tire's loose , and at 3,000 rpm look out all the way to 6500ish.I would have rather used vortec's but we had the double humps so we went for it.

You must be registered for see images attach

6" lift with 36s ? Nice looking by the way!
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,782
Reaction score
1,020
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Lets not forget that those older heads also need to be treated properly to be able to use the gas we have today as well as the valve seats can't take it.

Yeah, they would need to be changed to induction hardened seats. But, I'm not sure how you could tell if the work had been done to a pair of heads. I mean, it's been a problem since the 70s when unleaded gas went away.

GM did release a "service replacement" double hump head, but I don't recall the casting number, or if it had hardened seats.
 

MadOgre

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Posts
4,090
Reaction score
51
Location
NA
First Name
NA
Truck Year
NA
Truck Model
NA
Engine Size
NA
Are we talking about a 1960 something motor ? Early 70s received hardened seats from the factory.

In fact I have a 1976 motor right now that runs just fine with new gasoline and just so happens to have factory hardened seats in it. Which also happens to have the most desirable head casting to be used in truck applications. So why do I have to do something to my heads to run current fuel through it ?
 

MadOgre

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Posts
4,090
Reaction score
51
Location
NA
First Name
NA
Truck Year
NA
Truck Model
NA
Engine Size
NA
I also have 2 other mid 80s motors that have no head issues what so ever.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,401
Posts
956,720
Members
36,714
Latest member
MartinK5
Top