School me on intake manifolds and headers

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,098
Reaction score
7,806
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Also consider the vehicle when reading anecdotal evidence pertaining to open air element filters on forums.

A Corvette or Camaro doing in town driving will have much higher under hood temps than a 4x4 pickup with a large grill and no inner fender skirts circulating air around an engine bay that could fit 3 small blocks on a 55mph commute with 2 stop signs.

There are many variables to each combo. I am looking around for a cold air intake, but I’ve read about certain downsides on that side, too. I may get a oem type dual snorkel here, but I’m not expecting miracles.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,618
Reaction score
28,856
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I wouldnt go that far but, better than open element sucking in hot air. Ther eare other better options just not cheap for GMs mass production use.

It depends on the power needs. A higher HP engine will do much better with plenty of hot air rather than a limited supply of slightly cooler air.

As was pointed out, an old truck is going to have relatively low under hood temps. And if it does get cooking hot, it's because is very hot outside the truck too, so an intake tube wouldn't be pulling in very cool air anyway.
 

bigcountry78

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Posts
3,707
Reaction score
8,874
Location
Hickory, North Carolina
First Name
James
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K10 Custom Deluxe
Engine Size
350
These are the headers. I have no idea what brand, but they seem well made.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

legopnuematic

Licensed Junk Dealer
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Posts
2,612
Reaction score
6,883
Location
MO
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1971, 1̶9̶7̶4, 1976, 1979,1̶9̶8̶5, 2002
Truck Model
Dart Swinger, Sierra 10, C10 Cheyenne, C10 Big Ten, Silverado 10, Ram 2500
Engine Size
225/6, 350 c.i., 350 c.i., 5.9l Cummins

Dooley

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Posts
377
Reaction score
988
Location
North Coast
First Name
RW
Truck Year
1988
Truck Model
V30
Engine Size
454
Spend a little time and you might locate a cast iron high rise version of Chevrolet's aluminum high rise that was in the original Z28.
It's heavier but, also is flanged for both carbs, Rochester and Holley. GM # 14096011
If you are wanting an aluminum intake and not a high rise intake the one from an L82 engine has everything you would need for moderate street performance.
GM #14004377 or a GM3458520.
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
 
Last edited:

bigcountry78

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Posts
3,707
Reaction score
8,874
Location
Hickory, North Carolina
First Name
James
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K10 Custom Deluxe
Engine Size
350
Spend a little time and you might locate a cast iron high rise version of Chevrolet's aluminum high rise that was in the original Z28.
It's heavier but, also is flanged for both carbs, Rochester and Holley. GM # 14096011
If you are wanting an aluminum intake and not a high rise intake the one from an L82 engine has everything you would need for moderate street performance.
GM #14004377 or a GM3458520.
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
I’ll keep that one in mind.
 

bigcountry78

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Posts
3,707
Reaction score
8,874
Location
Hickory, North Carolina
First Name
James
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K10 Custom Deluxe
Engine Size
350
I really don’t think I’d lose anything by going to an open element air filter.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

trukman1

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Posts
340
Reaction score
138
Location
USA
First Name
Gary
Truck Year
1988
Truck Model
K5 Blazer
Engine Size
5.7 L (350)
I really don’t think I’d lose anything by going to an open element air filter.

You must be registered for see images attach

Easy way to find out is to turn the air cleaner lid upside down. That will give you enough additional air to see if you can tell the difference. If so, you may want to go open element. If not, no reason to waste the money, IMO.
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,782
Reaction score
1,020
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Don't forget to check the ignition advance curve. Not sure about your 78, but in order to keep emissions in check, many engines back then had little to zero advance at idle, and vacuum advance didn't kick in until part throttle. It might be necessary to mess with springs, weights, and even vacuum canister. I suggest Googling "high performance ignition advance" to learn about optimal timing. You'll be surprised at what some minor mods can do for performance and fuel mileage.
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,346
Reaction score
1,949
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350
This video contains some good information...
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
the difference in hp and torque is not that big and they have 450+ hp engine.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,618
Reaction score
28,856
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
This video contains some good information...
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
the difference in hp and torque is not that big and they have 450+ hp engine.

But in that test, they used a pretty decent set of manifolds. The average 70's and 80's manifolds were the log type.
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,346
Reaction score
1,949
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350
But in that test, they used a pretty decent set of manifolds. The average 70's and 80's manifolds were the log type.

That's true, The truck logs are surely worse than the hooker logs. Here is an article from hotrod magazin with a stock log type manifold ( which appears to be better than the 70 truck ones too.). https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hppp-0312-headers-vs-manifolds/ If you really want to know what is the best for your application you would have to mount and dyno the parts you want to use.
Tests like this just give you a rough idea of the difference the parts make.
 

Backfoot100

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Posts
374
Reaction score
648
Location
Florida
First Name
Eddie
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
C1500 Suburban
Engine Size
Carbed 350
I wouldn't say the results are that close.

The difference between the manifolds and long tube headers was something like 15HP!!! On a 400+ HP engine that's still pretty significant.
Figure that a set of cheap headers runs $200 on the high side for a 15HP increase. I'll take those numbers all day long. You have to consider the HP/dollar ROI. By far the cheapest HP increase you ever spend money on.

As stated, the manifold for this engine is almost a shorty header already. Even the guy pulling the dyno stated that 20 years ago the long tubes would be the way to go, hands down. No questions asked.

Its been proven for decades that the easiest and cheapest upgrade to increase HP on a factory engine is with a set of long tube headers. This test still proves that. The advanced design of the manifolds in this particular case just makes that increase less than what is normally anticipated.
 

KS2506

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Posts
20
Reaction score
5
Location
SW Kansas
First Name
James
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
K1500 Suburban
Engine Size
350
I had a '73 3/4 ton 4WD, 410 gears, limited slip rear, 12:50/ 16.5's, mud and snow tires, Hedman headers, Corvette fuel injection cam, Offy manifold, Holley 650 cfm carb. Best truck I ever had. Real mud and snow goer, Lots of pulling power. Get rid of the Quadra Jet and get a Holley spread bore, much better and easier to tune. Good Luck with your project.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,414
Posts
957,030
Members
36,741
Latest member
do4410
Top