Rear wheels are sucked in way more than front. K10. Adapters? BAD IDEA? pics inside

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,881
Reaction score
9,144
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
I feel like I should share this at some point:

I've been accused of making it sound like I was "everywhere all at once" back then and I don't want it to give that impression.


I've been thinking about writing a thread about "How I got so Smart", or something like that, but in a nutshell: it's "sneaking".

After 40 years at GM (45 in the industry now); across about a dozen different GM assembly plants (Flint, Pontiac, Ft Wayne, St Louis, Janesville, Oshawa, Fremont, Arlington, Silao, Wentzville, Mishawaka, Hamtramck come to mind), three or four pre-production shops and one skunk works (that I can't talk about) there's a lot of opportunities for an inquisitive guy to ask questions.

Even before I started my engineering curriculum at Flint I had a stint in Personnel. One of my jobs was to deliver the mail. As a result, one learns not only where all the "monuments" are in the plant, but three or four ways to get there: front ways, back ways, sneaky ways, etc.

While you are sneaking around you are getting to know folks and learning about their jobs, and learning about the process, by osmosis.

Even after that, as an "adult" when I would go to these various other plants for new model launch, I would ask my plant host to show me around ("...show me where you put the VINs on", or "...show me the paint body bank", or "take me out to paint repair") to further my understanding for use as a historian. They were happy to show off their place and I was genuinely interested (that is, I was not being manipulative to curry favor).

Being the engineering rep on the Program Team (2nd gen Denali and Escalade, 2003 product refresh, H2, Volt) gets you exposure to some high level people across the various functions (Purchasing, Quality, program mgmt, containerization, logistics) and how decisions get made.

Or - I would sneak around myself. I remember the first time I went to Wentzville they pretty much got me through the door and said "ok - we'll see you in a week". I had been there for about 10 minutes before they cut me loose to fend for myself, so - after finding where I was going to be working - I spent the rest of my time watching trucks get built and wandering around.

There is no shortage of things in a vehicle assembly plant to capture your imagination, if you are a car guy.

K
 
Last edited:

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,439
Reaction score
28,345
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I know the guy.

Ed Pauly was the suspension engineer for the squarebody trucks.

We lived in the same small town during our time on the program, so we had a lot of nice visits.

I'm not speculating. If I was I would say so, but a lot of squarebody history I don't have to speculate on (like the roof running lights a few threads ago).

K

Here's the thing about doing different generations of vehicles:

When the current version came out it was billed as the greatest thing since sliced bread.

So any change you make as a manufacturer has to be "better" than before. And then better again. And then better yet again. At best - It's unsustainable.

Think about fuel tank locations as an example. The squarebody had the tank outside the fuel rail, which was frowned upon when the GMT400 came out with the tank inside the frame rails.

Be reminded that the previous truck, though (67-72) had the tank inside the pickup cab.

K

I'm still saying that cost was the biggest reason... you know how those engineer types are.

Lol, you know I'm just teasing you I hope. I'll just always be highly skeptical, you know, since the 'better traction' reason also is the FAR cheaper option for a manufacturer, and every cent makes a big difference in the end.
 

yevgenievich

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
4,819
Reaction score
3,400
Location
Place
First Name
Name
Truck Year
Year
Truck Model
Model
Engine Size
Size
Gmt400 kept narrow rear track as well. And gm had opposing advertising claiming different track width better traction
 

mtbadbob

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2021
Posts
657
Reaction score
1,029
Location
Montana
First Name
Bob
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
Here's the thing about doing different generations of vehicles:

When the current version came out it was billed as the greatest thing since sliced bread.

So any change you make as a manufacturer has to be "better" than before. And then better again. And then better yet again. At best - It's unsustainable. And it's subject to the whims of the program team and what is "en vogue" at the time.

Think about fuel tank locations as an example. The squarebody had the tank outside the fuel rail, which was frowned upon in hindsight when the GMT400 came out with the tank inside the frame rails.

Be reminded that the previous truck, though (67-72) had the tank inside the pickup cab.

K
Wasn't the reason the GMT400 moved the fuel tanks inside the rails because of the BS lawsuit the kids parent's hit GM with because their son got t-boned at 55 mph & his Squarebody truck exploded??
 

mtbadbob

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2021
Posts
657
Reaction score
1,029
Location
Montana
First Name
Bob
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
Gmt400 kept narrow rear track as well. And gm had opposing advertising claiming different track width better traction
Yeah, and I'll say this about the GMT400 indy front axles. Dodge & Ford boys argue that GM's indy's don't get as good as traction as their trucks. I've been slayin' elk & retrieving them out of deep snow & steep mountains for 30 years, using my '89. All I can say is bring your $ you WANT to lose, I'll have the Hi-Lift, chains, & a tow strap to help you get back to safety! I've driven by so many of those trucks in 4 lo, 3rd gear that it had to be embarrassing for them. Everybody around here knows that when it gets REALLY WINTER on top of that mountain, 'ole blue is always 1 or 2 of the rig's that'll make it up top! The other guy drives a 90's lifted Tahoe w/34" Swampers. The diesel boys just stay home because they know their heavy tanks are worthless in those conditions. 1989 Chevy 2500, 350 TBI w/4 speed Granny Tranny. Original trans & rear-end. Odo stopped working in 2001 at 165k+ miles. Replaced clutch 10+ years ago. SORRY to hi-jack this thread, fella's!
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Attachments

  • 20181124_081613.jpg
    20181124_081613.jpg
    66.4 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,439
Reaction score
28,345
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Gmt400 kept narrow rear track as well. And gm had opposing advertising claiming different track width better traction

It was narrower than the front, yes. But not to the extreme of the squarebody trucks. The 4x4s got a wider housing than the 2wd trucks.
 

Blackbeard44

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Posts
280
Reaction score
258
Location
Washington State
First Name
andy
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
6.0 LS
whats the proper adapter thickness to correct this?
 

Nasty-LSX

TogetherforeverCovid19
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Posts
1,395
Reaction score
1,737
Location
HOUSTON TX
First Name
Mi Hung Lo
Truck Year
85/86/87
Truck Model
c10/k10/k20
Engine Size
LSX
Yeah, and I'll say this about the GMT400 indy front axles. Dodge & Ford boys argue that GM's indy's don't get as good as traction as their trucks. I've been slayin' elk & retrieving them out of deep snow & steep mountains for 30 years, using my '89. All I can say is bring your $ you WANT to lose, I'll have the Hi-Lift, chains, & a tow strap to help you get back to safety! I've driven by so many of those trucks in 4 lo, 3rd gear that it had to be embarrassing for them. Everybody around here knows that when it gets REALLY WINTER on top of that mountain, 'ole blue is always 1 or 2 of the rig's that'll make it up top! The other guy drives a 90's lifted Tahoe w/34" Swampers. The diesel boys just stay home because they know their heavy tanks are worthless in those conditions. 1989 Chevy 2500, 350 TBI w/4 speed Granny Tranny. Original trans & rear-end. Odo stopped working in 2001 at 165k+ miles. Replaced clutch 10+ years ago. SORRY to hi-jack this thread, fella's!
You must be registered for see images attach
BAD A$$!!
 

mtbadbob

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2021
Posts
657
Reaction score
1,029
Location
Montana
First Name
Bob
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
whats the proper adapter thickness to correct this?
I hate wheel spacers myself, and has anyone determined that'll make your truck drive/handle any better??
 
Last edited:

Nasty-LSX

TogetherforeverCovid19
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Posts
1,395
Reaction score
1,737
Location
HOUSTON TX
First Name
Mi Hung Lo
Truck Year
85/86/87
Truck Model
c10/k10/k20
Engine Size
LSX
whats the proper adapter thickness to correct this?
Im guessing a 1 1/2 in adapter. I ask Redfish on post #4 here what size he has. Maybe he will reply :happy160:
 

Redfish

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
2,653
Reaction score
14,278
Location
Prairieville, LA
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
350/5.7
Im guessing a 1 1/2 in adapter. I ask Redfish on post #4 here what size he has. Maybe he will reply :happy160:
I cannot remember and I am not avoiding you... well, I am procrastinating.

I hate to make our Northern Members jealous but I have been cutting grass all day. Yes, I have been on the d***ed lawn mower most of the day. Then I had to grill fish and vegetables for Mrs. Redfish's supper.
 

Nasty-LSX

TogetherforeverCovid19
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Posts
1,395
Reaction score
1,737
Location
HOUSTON TX
First Name
Mi Hung Lo
Truck Year
85/86/87
Truck Model
c10/k10/k20
Engine Size
LSX
I cannot remember and I am not avoiding you...
Never thought that :happy160: and I dont expect you to pull the wheel LOL. Sure does make your truck look perfect. I
will figure it out and post it here.
 

Redfish

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
2,653
Reaction score
14,278
Location
Prairieville, LA
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
350/5.7
Never thought that :happy160: and I dont expect you to pull the wheel LOL. Sure does make your truck look perfect. I
will figure it out and post it here.
Okay, the width difference is 3.1". You need 1.5" spacers.

I tried to measure mine but it cannot be done without pulling the wheel off. But it is 1.5", I am sure of it.

This pic was taken as part of this discussion in an older thread on this forum.


You must be registered for see images attach
 

DoubleDingo

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
11,250
Reaction score
17,176
Location
Right where I am
First Name
Bagoomba
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
81-C20 Silverado Camper Special-TH400-4.10s
Engine Size
Carb'ed Vortec 350

Forum statistics

Threads
44,162
Posts
950,642
Members
36,276
Latest member
2manysquares2care
Top