HEI module dwell time.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Matt69olds

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Posts
2,447
Reaction score
3,816
Location
Central Indiana
First Name
Matt
Truck Year
81
Truck Model
GMC 1/2 ton
Engine Size
455 Olds
I've heard a lot about module failures over the years and guys carrying spares. But I've installed several HEIs in 50s-70s project vehicles starting in mid-1990s, and none of those ever had a module, pickup, or coil failure. Some had stock internals, others were upgraded to MSD module, coil, rotor, and cap back when those kits were made in the USA and reasonably priced. Also put a Proform HEI in my 82 C10 in 2015.

I also had stock GM HEIs in four 74-81 Chevy and Buick daily drivers that I can think of. None of them ever failed. However, your comments and others make me want to carry a spare module. Just need to find one that isn't Chinese junk. What do you all recommend?
When HEI first came out, the modules did have some reliability issues. It didn’t take long for Delco to figure it out and solve the issue. Unfortunately, the bad reputation still lingers.

Even counting the time working in a dealership service department , I bet I have only replaced a dozen ignition modules over the years. I have never personally had one fail in one of my vehicles, however I did have a friend who’s car would die after it got hot.

If someone is having repeated module failure, either they are using junk parts, or the aren’t using the correct THERMAL heat transfer paste. Don’t use dielectric grease!!
 

1STLS1

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Posts
200
Reaction score
472
Location
West Phoenix AZ
First Name
MIchael
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Thank you, I learned something today.

I had a truck that was running great then one morning started running poorly, I determined it was spark or timing and threw a complete distributor at it and solved the problem. I now understand why.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,415
Reaction score
28,229
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I've heard a lot about module failures over the years and guys carrying spares. But I've installed several HEIs in 50s-70s project vehicles starting in mid-1990s, and none of those ever had a module, pickup, or coil failure. Some had stock internals, others were upgraded to MSD module, coil, rotor, and cap back when those kits were made in the USA and reasonably priced. Also put a Proform HEI in my 82 C10 in 2015.

I also had stock GM HEIs in four 74-81 Chevy and Buick daily drivers that I can think of. None of them ever failed. However, your comments and others make me want to carry a spare module. Just need to find one that isn't Chinese junk. What do you all recommend?

I've had a couple coils fail and at least one pickup coil, but can't remember any modules (of the large cap variety) failing on my own vehicles. I remember several customer vehicles with a failed module though. I read on here a while back that the Napa Echlin TP-45 (going off memory here) was a good one to buy, so that's what I have as spares.


When HEI first came out, the modules did have some reliability issues. It didn’t take long for Delco to figure it out and solve the issue. Unfortunately, the bad reputation still lingers.

Even counting the time working in a dealership service department , I bet I have only replaced a dozen ignition modules over the years. I have never personally had one fail in one of my vehicles, however I did have a friend who’s car would die after it got hot.

If someone is having repeated module failure, either they are using junk parts, or the aren’t using the correct THERMAL heat transfer paste. Don’t use dielectric grease!!

I know we've had the discussion about the paste a few times in the past. I've never had issues with using dielectric grease. However, this last time I was putting a distributor together I decided I'd use the paste... I couldn't find any. Napa was able to dig up a part number for the stuff, but it showed it was unavailable. I wound up at O'Reilly and they didn't have any either, but the guy behind the counter went picking through ignition module boxes until he found one with the heat paste packet in it. He simply gave it to me, lol.

What is a common place that heat paste can be bought?
 
Last edited:

Turbo4whl

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2019
Posts
3,120
Reaction score
7,241
Location
Downingtown, PA
First Name
Wayne
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
What is a common place that heat paste can be bought?
As most of you know I drive GM's, but I work on Ford's.
Ford dealer will have the paste. I would think GM dealers would have it too.
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
5,387
Reaction score
8,594
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I've had a couple coils fail and at least one pickup coil, but can't remember any modules (of the large cap variety) failing on my own vehicles. I remember several customer vehicles with a failed module though. I read on here a while back that the Napa Echlin TP-55 (going off memory here) was a good one to buy, so that's what I have as spares.




I know we've had the discussion about the paste a few times in the past. I've never had issues with using dielectric grease. However, this last time I was putting a distributor together I decided I'd use the paste... I couldn't find any. Napa was able to dig up a part number for the stuff, but it showed it was unavailable. I wound up at O'Reilly and they didn't have any either, but the guy behind the counter went picking through ignition module boxes until he found one with the heat paste packet in it. He simply gave it to me, lol.

What is a common place that heat paste can be bought?
Computer heat sink paste. So,your local computer shop
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,867
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
Really? What years models are they talking about. My 81 k20 plug gap is specs is .035 .
That article is pretty vague
The .060 is more to do with later HEI, however, I believe oldsmobile/pontiac did some couple years with .060, but it toasted components?
I could be remembering wrong but I think i read a long time ago something about that... lol.

But .060 would be, in my opinion, a lot for a stock HEI on a 1983 to use

But a different design plug, no ribs, di-electric screws on the rotor.... it would be easier than what you currently have.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,867
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
If you are not using a GM module in your HEI distributor then there is a good possibility your dwell time is not correct thru the entire RPM range, which also affects timing. I also use TPI on some engines which uses a small cap HEI, it has no advance built into the distributor it is all controlled by the computer. In this case there is a setting in the chips program that can compensate for the different dwell characteristics of different GM modules that can be installed, its called "Latency compensation". for each different p/n, all GM modules have this offset. Any off-brand module has no information on what to set the "Latency" to, so the dwell/timing advance is corrected. Lots of testing has been done to prove how the dwell/timing advance is affected by just swapping modules without changing the latency.
Use original GM pickup/modules that are for your engine. If you can find one.
TBI cars/trucks and their distributors had backup advance curves built into them , but not sure how similar that would be to those tpi units.
 

JoeR Jr

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2018
Posts
196
Reaction score
251
Location
Stokesdale, NC
First Name
Joe
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
6.0/4L80E
There is definitely a difference between Delco Modules and all others. A Delco will always saturate a Delco coil correctly. It will vary dwell based on RPMs and available voltage in order to make sure the coil is delivering maximum voltage. They can vary the dwell in 1 degree increments. The best aftermarket ones I ever tested varied in 5 degree increments (which isn't terrible) but most only had a couple of large steps in them, if any at all.
Aftermarket distributors also didn't deliver the same amperage as Delco coils. Here's a screen shot from a brand new parts house distributor. This van didn't start in really cold weather. Note that the peak amperage is 4 Amps

You must be registered for see images attach
Now Look at this one. Same distributor, Delco Coil. It's 6 amps. It cold starts now.

Whether you're running a 4 pin or 7 pin GM module, stick with Delco if you want it to perform well.
 

Attachments

  • 6a.png
    6a.png
    85.3 KB · Views: 11

75gmck25

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Posts
2,253
Reaction score
2,192
Location
Northern Virginia
First Name
Bruce
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
K25 Camper Special TH350 NP203
Engine Size
5.7
IIRC, .060 plug gap was an early spec for HEI, maybe when they were trying to improve the burn for emissions. Later on they found it put too much stress on the ignition to consistently fire across the wide gap, and revised the specs. I think the revised GM spec was .045, but I’m not positive. Some new plugs come gapped as small as .035.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,867
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
IIRC, .060 plug gap was an early spec for HEI, maybe when they were trying to improve the burn for emissions. Later on they found it put too much stress on the ignition to consistently fire across the wide gap, and revised the specs. I think the revised GM spec was .045, but I’m not positive. Some new plugs come gapped as small as .035.
Even Gen III LS engines with 8 coils had a TSB to drop the plug gap to reduce chugging and hesitation and driveability issues in the early 2000s , i think .45 was the one they used. But the normal expected gap they run is .060
The 3800 engines have been running .060 since about 1993-4 , wasted spark system on those but high quality set of 3 coils
 

Matt69olds

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Posts
2,447
Reaction score
3,816
Location
Central Indiana
First Name
Matt
Truck Year
81
Truck Model
GMC 1/2 ton
Engine Size
455 Olds
The .060 is more to do with later HEI, however, I believe oldsmobile/pontiac did some couple years with .060, but it toasted components?
I could be remembering wrong but I think i read a long time ago something about that... lol.

But .060 would be, in my opinion, a lot for a stock HEI on a 1983 to use

But a different design plug, no ribs, di-electric screws on the rotor.... it would be easier than what you currently have.
Oldsmobile use to specify .080 plug gap, and then later revised it. If I remember correctly, the issue was low speed misfired and ignition component wear.
 

Camar068

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Posts
4,291
Reaction score
3,335
Location
Kentucky
First Name
David
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K10/LM7 5.3/4L60e/np208/3.73/32"
Engine Size
10 yrs Air Force
Even Gen III LS engines with 8 coils had a TSB to drop the plug gap to reduce chugging and hesitation and driveability issues in the early 2000s , i think .45 was the one they used. But the normal expected gap they run is .060
The 3800 engines have been running .060 since about 1993-4 , wasted spark system on those but high quality set of 3 coils
seeing 0.040-0.044 range on RA for 2006 LS, with a note of OE 0.040
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,867
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
seeing 0.040-0.044 range on RA for 2006 LS, with a note of OE 0.040
hm they must not have decided to stick with larger gap then, probably was causing engine chuggle or harshness in lockup at certain speeds
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,867
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
Oldsmobile use to specify .080 plug gap, and then later revised it. If I remember correctly, the issue was low speed misfired and ignition component wear.
too hot of spark, maybe it was from the plug being hot enough to cause it to fire without a spark, wonder how a modern iridium with a small point, and maybe a different heat range plug would do in the same position on old car
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,096
Posts
949,232
Members
36,185
Latest member
binarysystems
Top