Gas to Diesel swap, question on fueling

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

idrivea2002golf

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2025
Posts
22
Reaction score
36
Location
San Diego
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
Not sure yet.
I'm reaching to the forum for recommendations/feedback/thoughts on fueling systems. I've been on the different square body forums looking up the function of the dual tank and the Pollack valve. Seems pretty straight forward. I don't like that it relies on the suction from the engine's mechanical pump for priming, I'd like to have a more proactive fuel supply. For reference truck is a 1981 so I have the 6 port with the motorized valve. I'm currently planning on swapping in a 7.3 idi out of a 90 F350.

Here's where I'm looking for feedback, as I see it I have two options:

Option 1: I keep the existing system as it is (obviously check for functionality and replace anything broken). Use the ON-OFF-ON momentary on the dash for the switching as it already does. In this case I would add an in-line fuel pump (diesel style) between the Pollack valve and the engine's mechanical pump. This would tie into the ignition system. Simplest option but I know these pumps make noise and I don't know if I'm going to want to hear it all the time. Chineseum pumps are 20-30$, Holley or AEM are 200ish.

Option 2: swap the fuel senders I currently have (1981 models) with senders/pumps from 1987+ and basically run two in tank pumps through the Pollack valve. This would require I swap the dash switch which isn't all that difficult. I like that this gives me pump redundancy as the in-line pumps can be fickle. Obviously more up front cost but really not terrible in the grand scope of this build. From my understanding the wiring is the same between the 1981-1986 and 1987+ at the valve, just need to tie in the sending pumps power lines. This also gives me the flow/pressure required for a diesel as I can get the 6.2 in tank pumps. Each pump is about 110$ on rockauto. So similar price to a quality (Holley) inline.

Option 3: something I'm not seeing?
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,480
Reaction score
2,128
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,195
Reaction score
8,022
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Also, 87+ also have baffled tanks to go with the in tank pump. May not matter, but something to consider.
 

Broken85

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2024
Posts
40
Reaction score
28
Location
Cumberland, NJ
First Name
A
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350

righteous project I drive. Check out this thread I started. I recently switched over to in tank electric pumps. I think I solved a lot of the questions you have, but maybe not all of them. FYI, the inline pump after the pollak valve did not work. It was not able to pull enough fuel through the pollack with just a siphon because those inline pumps push fuel, and not really pull at all. I had to start all over with in tank electric pumps.

To your other point. Dual redundancy, can’t beat it. So my relay wiring that I also individualized power to each tank as well
 
Last edited:

idrivea2002golf

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2025
Posts
22
Reaction score
36
Location
San Diego
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
Not sure yet.
Thou shalt not put them Ford parts into Chevies. ;D

The 1990 7.3 uses a mechanical fuel pump to feed the injector pump. Using the mechanical fuel pump that is on the engine would be the easiest way. No new sending units, no wiring work on the valve. Replacing a broken mechanical fuel pump is easy, can be done everywhere.
My 0.02$
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/ford,1990,f-350,7.3l+445cid+v8+diesel,1126549,fuel+&+air,fuel+pump,6256
Not to split hairs... but TECHNICALLY it's an International Harvester part connected to a ZF part connected to a Borg Warner part. :D Although I'm going to replace the borq warner part with a New Process part.

Plus, no worse than people putting a Dodge part (6BT) in a square body. Actually, I would argue the 6BT is worse given it is an inline 6, both Chevy and Ford use V configurations.

Silliness aside, the mechanical pump works but it's suction is crap. I'd like to find a more proactive fueling supply especially since switching the pollack valve could possibly introduce air if the unused tank isn't primed.
 
Last edited:

idrivea2002golf

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2025
Posts
22
Reaction score
36
Location
San Diego
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
Not sure yet.

righteous project I drive. Check out this thread I started. I recently switched over to in tank electric pumps. I think I solved a lot of the questions you have, but maybe not all of them. FYI, the inline pump after the pollak valve did not work. It was not able to pull enough fuel through the pollack with just a siphon because those inline pumps push fuel, and not really pull at all. I had to start all over with in tank electric pumps.

To your other point. Dual redundancy, can’t beat it. So my relay wiring that I also individualized power to each tank as well
Red3833's post with the diagrams and explanation of using the sniper output is kind of the swap I was thinking about doing.

I appreciate the feedback on the inline. My biggest concern, especially since I'm going to be dealing with a diesel, is having the inline pump not have enough suction.

I think I'm going to do the dual in tank setup.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,914
Reaction score
7,198
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
Red3833's post with the diagrams and explanation of using the sniper output is kind of the swap I was thinking about doing.

I appreciate the feedback on the inline. My biggest concern, especially since I'm going to be dealing with a diesel, is having the inline pump not have enough suction.

I think I'm going to do the dual in tank setup.
if you use the original fuel pump on the engine, you should use the ford pollack valve, since it was designed to suck diesel through the valve when not running
vs the pollack on these trucks was intended to support fuel being pushed through it
 

ali_c20

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Posts
1,480
Reaction score
2,128
Location
Austria
First Name
Alexander
Truck Year
1974, 1979
Truck Model
C20, K5
Engine Size
350, 350
Not to split hairs... but TECHNICALLY it's an International Harvester part connected to a ZF part connected to a Borg Warner part. :D Although I'm going to replace the borq warner part with a New Process part.

Plus, no worse than people putting a Dodge part (6BT) in a square body. Actually, I would argue the 6BT is worse given it is an inline 6, both Chevy and Ford use V configurations.

Silliness aside, the mechanical pump works but it's suction is crap. I'd like to find a more proactive fueling supply especially since switching the pollack valve could possibly introduce air if the unused tank isn't primed.
When you rip it out of a Ford truck it's a ford part ;D
The dual intake pump setup is the best solution imo.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
7,489
Reaction score
13,374
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
if you use the original fuel pump on the engine, you should use the ford pollack valve, since it was designed to suck diesel through the valve when not running
vs the pollack on these trucks was intended to support fuel being pushed through it
^This doesn’t make sense to me. First, a 1981 Chevy has fuel being pulled thru the tank valve. Like every other truck before efi. Second, it doesn’t matter to the pollack valve anyway. Push or pull.
Also, practically, there’s no reason imo an original Chevy valve would be restrictive anyway. If it’ll pull enough gas thru for sub 5mpg full throttle pulls on a gas engine, it will work for something that needs less fuel like an old diesel. Unless you think viscosity is a problem. But it’s not since GM also had diesels using the same valve.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,914
Reaction score
7,198
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
^This doesn’t make sense to me. First, a 1981 Chevy has fuel being pulled thru the tank valve. Like every other truck before efi. Second, it doesn’t matter to the pollack valve anyway. Push or pull.
Also, practically, there’s no reason imo an original Chevy valve would be restrictive anyway. If it’ll pull enough gas thru for sub 5mpg full throttle pulls on a gas engine, it will work for something that needs less fuel like an old diesel. Unless you think viscosity is a problem. But it’s not since GM also had diesels using the same valve.
I dont know what to tell you, im just guessing that an otherwise identical valve would be different, and its only for diesel. I can be wrong, but maybe theres something exposed to the fuel that would corrode with diesel but not gas.
Assuming this isnt a concern, The reason I brought up pressure has to do with fords diesel is pushing fuel from the tank
But gms diesel is pulling diesel from the tank. Am I right on this? I dont know either detroits or powerstroke (as opposed to IDI)


and as I re-read, I realize now that he said IDI not powerstroke, so both are pulling.

he wants to, however, push through.
I think I brought up the pollack from ford because their powerstrokes push through that pollak with like 60psi, And I have 0 idea if the gas one used by GM is going to do that safely. The TBI pump in the tank isnt pushing 60psi , so it wouldnt have been a consideration. And unless I am mistaken, the detroit is pulling fuel from the engine? I dont know what kinds of pressures he needs from the tank to get IDI happy, but an ancillary concern was the possibility of the valve not being fully one way or the other. But a fresh valve, tank with baffling, and good fuel lines shouldnt have any issue?

maybe get poly tanks to reduce metal accumulation possibilty
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
7,489
Reaction score
13,374
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
^Im not an expert on IDI engines either. And never will be but from all the other diesels I’ve been around and worked on, they only need minimal positive pressure to the injection pump so not a big concern about fuel pressure upstream of the IP.
This is half supposition since idk idi lol.

Pretty sure one could run a low pressure electric pump just downstream of the tank valve quite reliably. Have had that setup with a cheesy little pump feeding the K20 and it works. That would be the simplest and least intrusive if one doesn’t need to replace a pile of parts in the first place (tanks, senders, valve etc)
 

Burban

Bear
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Posts
89
Reaction score
8
Location
Uranus
First Name
H
Truck Year
83
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
Haven't seen it mentioned, but on a dual tank setup, how do you handle the return?

AFAIK any diesel is going to need a return line, how does it know which tank to return to.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,995
Posts
973,048
Members
37,897
Latest member
slewis
Top