carburetor size on a 350

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Turbo4whl

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2019
Posts
3,103
Reaction score
7,192
Location
Downingtown, PA
First Name
Wayne
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
Sounds like this problem. “My significant other wants to jump my bones twice a day, you guys think that is too much”?

If you were closer I could help you with that issue.
 

rt66paul

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Posts
230
Reaction score
109
Location
California
First Name
paul
Truck Year
1991 suburban
Truck Model
2500
Engine Size
7.4
A 780 CFM was stock on a Z28 302. I depends how built the engine is.
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,768
Reaction score
994
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Tell them the standard Quadrajet flows that much or more and stop talking to those people?
Yes, but the Q-jet primaries are tiny for great throttle response, and the secondaries open just enough the satisfy engine demand, which is not 100% open on a 350. That was the beauty of those carbs. You could probably put one on a 265 and it would work just fine running around on the tiny primaries, with the secondaries partially opening when needed. And then with some jetting changes, put it on a 400.

The Edelbrock 750 is a different animal. Its primaries are slightly smaller than the secondaries, but are larger than the Edelbrock 600 carb's primaries. So, the 600 will have crisper throttle response. That's a fact, Jack. And the 600's secondaries will probably never fully open, unless were talking about a 6,000 RPM engine with >90% VE. For reference, the 7,000 RPM 365hp/327 used a 585 CFM Holley, as did the base 390hp/427. It's simply a function of RPM, cubic inches, and VE.

That said, I think the new 650 Edlebrock AVS2 series would be my choice the the OP's engine. With its annular boosters and air valve adjustment it would blow away the antique 750 in every category. About that engine, what are the cam specs?
 

Octane

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Posts
2,038
Reaction score
3,629
Location
Atlanta
First Name
Eddie
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Yes, but the Q-jet primaries are tiny for great throttle response, and the secondaries open just enough the satisfy engine demand, which is not 100% open on a 350. That was the beauty of those carbs. You could probably put one on a 265 and it would work just fine running around on the tiny primaries, with the secondaries partially opening when needed. And then with some jetting changes, put it on a 400.

The Edelbrock 750 is a different animal. Its primaries are slightly smaller than the secondaries, but are larger than the Edelbrock 600 carb's primaries. So, the 600 will have crisper throttle response. That's a fact, Jack. And the 600's secondaries will probably never fully open, unless were talking about a 6,000 RPM engine with >90% VE. For reference, the 7,000 RPM 365hp/327 used a 585 CFM Holley, as did the base 390hp/427. It's simply a function of RPM, cubic inches, and VE.

That said, I think the new 650 Edlebrock AVS2 series would be my choice the the OP's engine. With its annular boosters and air valve adjustment it would blow away the antique 750 in every category. About that engine, what are the cam specs?
You speaking of primaries and secondaries etc, I had a Plymouth horizon with a holley carb on it back in the 1980s. I rebuilt it and somehow reversed the jets. It would bog down from zero to 30 and you couldn't hardly get it going but after you got up say past 30 mph it ran like a top from there on up to highway speed. I took it back apart seen what I had done. The smaller jet was the secondary and the larger jet was the primary, so when I had It reversed it couldn't get enough fuel to get started to speed.lol. I've done some carburetors from the '70s forward, mostly two barrels and that's the only one I ever screwed up on. I say it ran like a top when she got up to speed was a bit of an overstatement I should have said it ran better than it did starting off. Lol
 

chevyninja350

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2021
Posts
13
Reaction score
2
Location
Illinois Near St. Louis area.
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
I need help.
I know stock Chevy 350s are happy with 650 CFM carburetors. That being said I have a 750 Edelbrock 1411 on my non bored over 350 9.93:1 compression that is far from stock.

It has an Edelbrock dual-plane intake, A lopey 510/520 lift cam (2200-5800 RPM) and aftermarket vortec heads that I have ported and Polished myself.

Whenever I tell people I have a 750 CFM on a 350 they freak out saying my carburetor is too big but to me it doesn't feel like it's too big. When I stomp on the gas it does not bog it just goes, when I read my spark plugs either after daily driving it for a while or driving it hard the spark plugs look clean with light amount of soot around the ring at the end of the threads (in other words they look fine to me) and the vehicle idles fine. If this will tell you anything I have a vacuum reading between 15 and 16 inHg. I have not changed Jets metering rods or Springs.

When I tell people (including shop owners) that the engine runs fine. they say oh well it's still too big you're probably losing to tuneability or losing power at higher rpms.

So what I'm asking is is my carburetor too big, if not what defense can I use to make these people stop freaking out and what are the signs that a carburetor is too big?


1985 chevy c10 262 v6 swapped to around 400hp 350 vortec heads
Stage 3 700r4


Only a few people have partially answered my question. So here is a revision of my original post.

I want to use an Edelbrock/Carter AFB carburetor. For one reason or another I'm not interested in a Quadrajet, Holley or any other carburetor. I just want to keep the Edelbrock 4 barrel in mind for my question or questions rather.

My spark plugs look fine, The engine does not bog or stumble when I stomp on the gas. I am getting 15 to 16 inHg when I take a manifold vacuum reading.

Basically my questions were:
Given the information I have provided and the fact it seems to runs fine, Do you think my carburetor is too big, if not what defense can I use to make these people stop freaking out? If you do think it is to big, why is it to big and what disadvantages might it have to my setup? what are the signs that a carburetor is too big?

Here is refresher of my setup:
Chevy 350 not over bored
9.93:1 Compression
Edelbrock performer dual plane intake (7116)
Summit Racing Vortec heads that I ported and polished (sum-151124)
1.5 Roller rockers
Comp cams 510/520 lift, 282/288 (230/236 @.050) duration, 2200-5800 RPM, cam put in dot to dot.
PerTronix Flame-Thrower Hei distributor with 50,000 volt coil (D1051)
 

SirRobyn0

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2019
Posts
6,755
Reaction score
11,402
Location
In the woods in Western Washington
First Name
Rob
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
305
Yes, but the Q-jet primaries are tiny for great throttle response, and the secondaries open just enough the satisfy engine demand, which is not 100% open on a 350. That was the beauty of those carbs. You could probably put one on a 265 and it would work just fine running around on the tiny primaries, with the secondaries partially opening when needed. And then with some jetting changes, put it on a 400.

The Edelbrock 750 is a different animal. Its primaries are slightly smaller than the secondaries, but are larger than the Edelbrock 600 carb's primaries. So, the 600 will have crisper throttle response. That's a fact, Jack. And the 600's secondaries will probably never fully open, unless were talking about a 6,000 RPM engine with >90% VE. For reference, the 7,000 RPM 365hp/327 used a 585 CFM Holley, as did the base 390hp/427. It's simply a function of RPM, cubic inches, and VE.

That said, I think the new 650 Edlebrock AVS2 series would be my choice the the OP's engine. With its annular boosters and air valve adjustment it would blow away the antique 750 in every category. About that engine, what are the cam specs?

The above information is correct and I agree with all of it. I've done carburetor rebuilding as a professional, and I can not see why some folks don't like the Q-jet other than lack of understanding / complicated. Once setup properly it'll run more efficient and longer than any other carb. With that said there is nothing wrong with wanting a simpler / easier to adjust / tune carburetor if that's what you want.

Only a few people have partially answered my question. So here is a revision of my original post.

I want to use an Edelbrock/Carter AFB carburetor. For one reason or another I'm not interested in a Quadrajet, Holley or any other carburetor. I just want to keep the Edelbrock 4 barrel in mind for my question or questions rather.

My spark plugs look fine, The engine does not bog or stumble when I stomp on the gas. I am getting 15 to 16 inHg when I take a manifold vacuum reading.

Basically my questions were:
Given the information I have provided and the fact it seems to runs fine, Do you think my carburetor is too big, if not what defense can I use to make these people stop freaking out? If you do think it is to big, why is it to big and what disadvantages might it have to my setup? what are the signs that a carburetor is too big?

Here is refresher of my setup:
Chevy 350 not over bored
9.93:1 Compression
Edelbrock performer dual plane intake (7116)
Summit Racing Vortec heads that I ported and polished (sum-151124)
1.5 Roller rockers
Comp cams 510/520 lift, 282/288 (230/236 @.050) duration, 2200-5800 RPM, cam put in dot to dot.
PerTronix Flame-Thrower Hei distributor with 50,000 volt coil (D1051)

@chevyninja350 Looks like your fairly new around here, or at least to posting. Let me tell ya nothing will spark a hot debate like a carb question. So when you get folks that go off on one thing or another realize that's just the way it is here. Part of the reason I wrote so much about the Q-Jet is because the forum is viewable on the internet and someone might wander in and find it useful. I feel the need to speak of what I know.

I think I did answer your question in my first post, but encase I was not clear your setup is perfectly fine. No it's not the one I would choose, but the only problem you have it that some people keep telling you the carb is to big when you know it's not. The truck runs right, gets good mileage, why would you change it. No reason to. Enjoy it.
 

75gmck25

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
2,159
Location
Northern Virginia
First Name
Bruce
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
K25 Camper Special TH350 NP203
Engine Size
5.7
For the OP - I'll assume you are a relatively young guy who still cares about someone else "freaking out" about something on your vehicle. I think I'm way beyond that point.

As you get older you will realize there are all kinds of idiots and *ssholes out there, and most of them have no interest in doing more than just jerking your chain about something on your truck. They don't really have much expertise, so they just poke at you about details they think they understand. The same guys will freak out if you are running 2.73 gears or 4.56 gears, or using tires that are too big or small, or a 700R4 behind a high hp engine, etc. Its best to just ignore them, unless you really believe they have the expertise to make a useful contribution. Its your vehicle and you know your own priorities.
 

Snoots

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Posts
8,665
Reaction score
17,771
Location
Georgia
First Name
Roger
Truck Year
1973
Truck Model
Jimmy Sierra
Engine Size
350 w/203
A lot of what you hear are opinions. Like bungholes, everybody has them. Listen to everybody but pay attention to those that speak from personal experience.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
43,953
Posts
946,427
Members
36,004
Latest member
way2low
Top