4L80e Swap Build Thread

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Matt69olds

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Posts
2,447
Reaction score
3,816
Location
Central Indiana
First Name
Matt
Truck Year
81
Truck Model
GMC 1/2 ton
Engine Size
455 Olds
I have asked some very knowledgeable people about why HydraMatic decided to redesign the lube circuits on the later 4L80 transmissions, nobody has any really good explanations. The original 400, and the early 4L80, shared basically the same design starting in 1964. If it’s worked for 50 years, why change it?! In my experience, the only time you see damage to planetary gearsets or excessive bushing wear is when the trans is either run low on fluid, the cooler lines are kinked or otherwise restricted, flat towed for long distances with the engine off,or the filter gets plugged up.

There are a bunch of dimensional changes to what looks like identical parts between the early and late model trans. The ATSG book says the changes were made to improve durability. How do you improve durability to a transmission that will easily handle twice it’s rated capacity? The torque capacity of the 4L80 is rated at 440 by HydraMatic, that’s ridiculously conservative. I have no idea what torture test process they used to come up with that number, nobody I know would hesitate putting twice that to any junkyard unit in decent shape.

The ultimate weakness in any 4L80 is the overdrive sprag. In any gear other than overdrive, all the engines power has to go thru that relatively tiny sprag. Sonnax has developed a add on valve body to engage the overdrive brake clutch to help the sprag, but even with all that the 4L80 will never be as strong as a 400.

I wouldn’t put too much into the belief the later 4L80 are better. The parts are basically the same, what is different is related to the center lube modifications.
 

Nasty-LSX

TogetherforeverCovid19
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Posts
1,395
Reaction score
1,735
Location
HOUSTON TX
First Name
Mi Hung Lo
Truck Year
85/86/87
Truck Model
c10/k10/k20
Engine Size
LSX
I have asked some very knowledgeable people about why HydraMatic decided to redesign the lube circuits on the later 4L80 transmissions, nobody has any really good explanations. The original 400, and the early 4L80, shared basically the same design starting in 1964. If it’s worked for 50 years, why change it?! In my experience, the only time you see damage to planetary gearsets or excessive bushing wear is when the trans is either run low on fluid, the cooler lines are kinked or otherwise restricted, flat towed for long distances with the engine off,or the filter gets plugged up.

There are a bunch of dimensional changes to what looks like identical parts between the early and late model trans. The ATSG book says the changes were made to improve durability. How do you improve durability to a transmission that will easily handle twice it’s rated capacity? The torque capacity of the 4L80 is rated at 440 by HydraMatic, that’s ridiculously conservative. I have no idea what torture test process they used to come up with that number, nobody I know would hesitate putting twice that to any junkyard unit in decent shape.

The ultimate weakness in any 4L80 is the overdrive sprag. In any gear other than overdrive, all the engines power has to go thru that relatively tiny sprag. Sonnax has developed a add on valve body to engage the overdrive brake clutch to help the sprag, but even with all that the 4L80 will never be as strong as a 400.

I wouldn’t put too much into the belief the later 4L80 are better. The parts are basically the same, what is different is related to the center lube modifications.

Matt, you are spot on correct.
 

Daveo91Burb

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Posts
663
Reaction score
231
Location
Vancouver, WA
First Name
Dave
Truck Year
1991
Truck Model
V2500 Silverado Suburban
Engine Size
Vortec 383, modified TBI/4L80e
Ended up keeping my original trans. I worked with the shop and had them install a TransGo shift kit and replace the force motor to the later style, that will allow me to use the later model ('7427) PCM. The weird thing is they found that the force motor was already the later style so I theoretically would have been OK to upgrade the PCM all along. but they replaced the part anyway since they are a known wear item. On the short drive home from the shop the firmer shifts from the shift kit were definitely noticeable.

Now I have the fun project of re-pinning the connectors for the PCM on the wiring harness. Connectors are different for the later PCM. I bought the Lisle tool for GM wiring pins to help.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,100
Posts
949,355
Members
36,196
Latest member
snickersj
Top