1978 Scottsdale Drag Link Question

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Kurnacopia

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Posts
259
Reaction score
268
Location
Tucson, AZ
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
Scottsdale
Engine Size
383
Good Morning,
So I was looking at the old drag link from my Scottsdale yesterday and though to myself why use old tech for this draglink? Its ugly as hell and uses old ball joints. So my brain started to churn and I thought about using 3/4" Heim joints along with some safety inserts and some DOM tubing to make a new and modern drag link. The photos below kind of illustrate the parts I am thinking about. So here is my question to all you gearheads and engineers: Is there a reason why the Heim Joint idea is bad for a drag link for push pull steering. I know it will be tighter, but my steering has always been a sloppy mess and I want the best handling possible. I will have two steering stabilizers up front so I'm not worried about steering bump. Link will be about 15.5 inches long, sturdy as hell, and will be able to flex with the joints seen below.

So....thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • OldDragLink.JPG
    OldDragLink.JPG
    191.6 KB · Views: 77
  • Heim Drag.jpg
    Heim Drag.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 75
  • SafetySpacer.jpg
    SafetySpacer.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 74
  • IMG_6571.JPG
    IMG_6571.JPG
    119.8 KB · Views: 78
  • IMG_6611.JPG
    IMG_6611.JPG
    147.4 KB · Views: 87

MarineOne

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2023
Posts
440
Reaction score
454
Location
Western New York
First Name
David
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
454
Is there a reason you don't convert to crossover steering? That'd stiffen it right up
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,396
Reaction score
28,178
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
The ball-type joints will FAR outlast the heim joints. It's why modern vehicles still use ball type joints.
 

Kurnacopia

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Posts
259
Reaction score
268
Location
Tucson, AZ
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
Scottsdale
Engine Size
383
Is there a reason you don't convert to crossover steering? That'd stiffen it right up
I tried and was immediately told I needed a lift of 3" or higher. Mine is only 2"
 

89GMCJimmy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
101
Reaction score
61
Location
90245
First Name
ivan
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
I used the Moog 2026R and 2027L with the ORD sleeve I have a 3 1/2" lift with drop pitman arm
the steering feels great. I also have Borgeson shaft in place of old rag joint
 

Attachments

  • ORDdraglink.jpeg
    ORDdraglink.jpeg
    123.5 KB · Views: 64

89GMCJimmy

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
101
Reaction score
61
Location
90245
First Name
ivan
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
What lift did you use?
Did you measure to see if its true 2" from tope of tube to bottom bumpstop bracket my TC was 3"
It took me a while to get the steering I wanted finally got it for push pull since under the 4" lift
 

Attachments

  • lift%22.jpeg
    lift%22.jpeg
    87.8 KB · Views: 60

Mark80K15

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Posts
91
Reaction score
51
Location
Sicamous, BC
First Name
Mark
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K15
Engine Size
350
I just installed a 2" ORD lift and used their drag link (Factory Push/Pull Steering with Jam Nuts, SKU U9015-S4.75), the Moog drag link ends ES2026R and ES2027L, and their 2" Drop Pitman Arm (SKU CA50-I). I thought I'd add some pictures to show how the assembly went together, and the angle of the drag link at different steering positions. From what I've read, the drag link angle should match that of the leaf spring. I think that is generally true when the wheels are turned all the way to the left or are in the center, but not when turned all the way to the right. I'll post again once I've driven it and let you know the results.
 

Attachments

  • turn_left_top_view.JPG
    turn_left_top_view.JPG
    213.7 KB · Views: 37
  • center_top_view.JPG
    center_top_view.JPG
    214.1 KB · Views: 38
  • turn_right_top_view.JPG
    turn_right_top_view.JPG
    216.9 KB · Views: 39
  • turn_left_side_view.JPG
    turn_left_side_view.JPG
    171.6 KB · Views: 37
  • center_side_view.JPG
    center_side_view.JPG
    165.8 KB · Views: 41

Mark80K15

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Posts
91
Reaction score
51
Location
Sicamous, BC
First Name
Mark
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K15
Engine Size
350
One more picture:
 

Attachments

  • turn_right_side_view.JPG
    turn_right_side_view.JPG
    182.6 KB · Views: 37

Mark80K15

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Posts
91
Reaction score
51
Location
Sicamous, BC
First Name
Mark
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K15
Engine Size
350
Well, I've completed the wheel alignment and driven my truck @ 60 MPH and more. Steering seems real good. So I conclude that the drag link angle is just fine, which in my mind lays to rest the urban myth that the drag link must be horizontal.
 

Old Guy Bill

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Posts
426
Reaction score
1,313
Location
KY
First Name
Bill
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
400
I’ve got an ORD 4” lift on my ‘78 K20, the drag link angle seems excessive to me, but this is without the cab & box on the chassis.
Hopefully the springs will settle somewhat…
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,067
Posts
948,702
Members
36,134
Latest member
gtewolf79
Top