MikeB
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2014
- Posts
- 1,782
- Reaction score
- 1,020
- Location
- North Texas
- First Name
- Mike
- Truck Year
- 1969
- Truck Model
- C10
- Engine Size
- 355
Nothing is easy for sure, but mine didn't leak and I had heat insulation on the floors. I also had a small gear reduction starter.Nothing easy as far as headers, they don’t fit, they leak, you end up end wrenching the plugs, interferes with starter access and a noisy passenger compartment to boot.
Mine were Patriot #8048 headers on an 82 C10 with a mild 355, meaning Ramjet cam and Vortec heads. The biggest problem was I had to re-route the fuel and brake lines on the passenger side to clear the #2 tube, which required removing the side motor mount. I also had to piece together some mandrel-bent sections of pipe to go up and over (and down and under) the asymmetrical trans cross member.
And that was a fairly easy installation compared to some I've done and read about. At least there was no frame interference, and spark plugs were all accessible, some with only a box end wrench, though. After all the work (and money), I didn't notice any seat-of-the-pants difference over cast iron manifolds with the same 2-1/4" exhaust pipes and DynoMax Super Turbo mufflers.
One more thing: When I rewired the engine, I had to remove the passenger side header to access the starter terminals. So, yes, it's always something!
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
On my mild 355, these manifolds worked just as well as headers, according to my butt dyno. I forget the P/Ns, but I port-matched them to the raised ports on the Vortec heads. I did that with the Patriot headers, too.
You must be registered for see images attach
Attachments
Last edited: