Doppleganger
Full Access Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2019
- Posts
- 12,677
- Reaction score
- 58,775
- Location
- OH-MI: Just like it sounds
- First Name
- Chris
- Truck Year
- 1985
- Truck Model
- K20
- Engine Size
- 5.7
I know that the more unions, the more the chance to leak. I have noticed most cars have little to no unions in the fuel lines.....a one continuous shot from tank to manifold. Carbs - meh. EFI....more PSI, etc.
I am running my fuel lines at the moment. Was going to 90 them out of the frame channel with a fitting. Then another line that hugs the firewall up to the FI (which supplies/returns on the back of the intake). With no cab, motor, headers, AC/heater lines, etc in place, I can measure and ballpark, but not be certain what might interfere with the lines.
Soooo.....thinking of bending a slight 45 in the line inside the frame channel to bring it out to access it easier and put the fitting there - then bend something more precise when everything is in. This would add 2 more connectors between the tank and the fuel rail. Sound like an ok plan?
Thanks.
I am running my fuel lines at the moment. Was going to 90 them out of the frame channel with a fitting. Then another line that hugs the firewall up to the FI (which supplies/returns on the back of the intake). With no cab, motor, headers, AC/heater lines, etc in place, I can measure and ballpark, but not be certain what might interfere with the lines.
Soooo.....thinking of bending a slight 45 in the line inside the frame channel to bring it out to access it easier and put the fitting there - then bend something more precise when everything is in. This would add 2 more connectors between the tank and the fuel rail. Sound like an ok plan?
Thanks.