They are trying to eliminate ICEs not just diesels the general public perceives old vehicles as a pollution problem. Soccer moms and for that matter most grown men don't know the difference between a 5.3 and a duramax.
ww2.arb.ca.gov
Unfortunately, Washington is one of those get rid of ICE states and I live in it. They will ultimately have to delay it. Even though we have hydro it has a finite limit. At the same time tree huggers want to rip out dams and have been successful doing so to some extent. Due to whatever you want to blame it on rainfall totals have been lower than normal.
Wait until battery cars get some years on them. At 10 years batteries will start needing replacement. Especially if fast charging is used frequently. Car will become basically worthless. Battery replacement will exceed what car is worth. Last week there was an article on the Ford truck battery replacement cost. It was about 35K.
Sure, depending on the vehicle could say the same about engine replacement exceeding vehicle value however you're not paying a premium from the beginning.
Another issue is all the new population. Every one of them contributes to pollution in some manner. If gov was really concerned about it, that would halt.
Here's the rub, if gov wants to expand battery vehicles, no natural gas or coal, many new nuclear power plants will have to be built. If one was proposed today would take 20 years before permit was granted. Until that happens it's just smoke and mirrors.
We are being played. Hope the general public wakes up before it is too late.