8.1 vortec into 1979 k30

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,962
Reaction score
15,135
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
Yea, me and friend already had looked into this, as he LOVED riding in my 79' c10 with a 502ci bbc,

but as appetizing as 496 ci of coil on plug motor with modern fuel injection and engine management sounds, it's about as much of a hassle as a LS is to drop into your squarebody, and additionally, as @Bextreme04 already said, you have like a whole whopping 2 vendors for gen 7 bbc parts, and it's gonna cost more than your run of the mill LS swap.

You'll reach about a max of 550hp with tune or cam until it's time to step up and get bigger heads and crank setups.

I have some friends that did a cam swap on his 8.1 avalanche, it started breaking the stock t case and 4L80e

You can also make STUPID POWER on just 15 psi of boost on that 8.1 that'll downright shame every little 5.3, 4.8, 6.0, and 6.2 out there, but it's more money than most are willing to pay.

God awful amounts of money. It's not a run of the mill generation 1-6 truck motor.
Really any large motor, unless you just pull it our with 300,000 miles and put it in your squarebody, is gonna be expensive AF

Anything large displacement is gonna be more than most are comfortable paying, bc everyone wants cheap and easy.
The 8.1 is not cheap and easy.
 
Last edited:

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,962
Reaction score
15,135
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
I'm not trying be all negative or anything, as I LOVE big blocks, but I hate paying for them lol

I wish you would swap the 496 in , OP.


My plan one day is to do a make shift type LS conversion to my 502ci with CNP, reluctors on the crank and cam, holley dominator ECU, a custom intake with fuel rails for ported injection.... but sheit THATS even more expensive
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,962
Reaction score
15,135
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
Side note, and I hate to say this, I don't think that 4 speed is gonna survive long behind a 8.1 vortec , unless you just play nice with it and don't abuse it too hard.

I'm sure for example, @Shorty81 doesn't wind his 496 up to 5,000 and dump the clutch.

I'm confident I could split a 4 speed in half with my 502ci in pretty short order if I hooked my drag slicks and dumped it enough tines or if anything shred a gear ot two

Put a built 4L80e behind the 8.1
 
Last edited:

Shorty81

Baby Boomer
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
3,082
Reaction score
5,729
Location
North West ohio
First Name
Darren
Truck Year
86
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
496
Side note, and I hate to say this, I don't think that 4 speed is gonna survive long behind a 8.1 vortec , unless you just play nice with it and don't abuse it too hard.

I'm sure for example, @Shorty81 doesn't wind his 496 up to 5,000 and dump the clutch.

I'm confident I could split a 4 speed in half with my 502ci in pretty short order if I hooked my drag slicks and dumped it enough tines or if anything shred a gear ot two

Put a built 4L80e behind the 8.1
Well Vince...you know me well. Me and the dogs drive around the back roads sipping beer and rarely getting out of 2nd-3rd gear. Might hit 1000 rpms occasionally...LOL!!!
 

Craig 85

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Posts
3,913
Reaction score
4,112
Location
Nashville, TN
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K30 SRW
Engine Size
454/TH-400/NP205
Last edited:

Lu Blunt

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
190
Reaction score
129
Location
Rye, CO
First Name
Luke
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
K30
Engine Size
350ci
@Dooley You are correct about needing a big block power steering pump bracket. I have the psc pump and external reservoir now, not sure which bracket will work.

@Bextreme04 You are correct, the 8.1 uses a tall deck block unique to itself. I was misinformed about it sharing the 502 block. I’m familiar with raylar engineering and have been reading thru the writes ups. Plan is to stay stock and run cheap gas. I appreciate the info and link to engine mount adapters. Everything I read says the original style mounts can be used. I will see how the ORD mounts fit then go from there.

This is the most accurate info I’ve found

8.1's are based on traditional big block chevy, but share electronics with LSx family. 24x crank trigger, 1x cam trigger, coil per cylinder, drive by wire. All the bolt holes are in the same place as traditional BBC, except all holes are METRIC thread. The 8.1 is a tall deck engine, 10.2 vs 9.8 " deck height, so heads sit higher, and outward toward fenders a little more then regular big block. Exhaust manifold/header pattern IS THE SAME, but with metric holes.
Oil pan is unique. Mark 5 and Mark 6 oil pans don’t fit. The valve cover patter is similar to traditional BBC, except for one hole on each side. The heads use two additional head bolts, and a different bolt pattern. So 8100 heads WILL NOT go on traditional BBC, or vice verse.

The 8100 is net lash, no adjutment to valve train. However, you can get a stud from ARP with metric threads on bottom, standard on top, and run regular big block chevy adjustable valve train stuff.

Camshaft is roller, you CAN install older Mark V, Mark VI roller cam's. This will change firing order back to 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2. In stock form, the 8100 shares SAME firing order as LSx family. Programming would need done to change injector bank assignment.


@Vbb199 How will it cost more than an LS swap? The 8.1 is like swapping in most other big blocks expect you’ll need a wiring harness, ecm and upgraded fuel system. LS swap will need all that plus a conversion kit to run the sm465. I agree if crazy high hp numbers are the goal than a regular 454 will be a better choice to build with a larger variety of aftermarket parts. I want the 8.1 for modern fuel injection and low rpm torque. Not cheap to add aftermarket efi to an older motor. I would have used a 7.4l vortec but found a good deal on the 8.1l. No need to spend god awful amounts of money when the stock 8.1 makes plenty of power for a work truck. I’m not worried about the sm465.
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,962
Reaction score
15,135
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
@Dooley You are correct about needing a big block power steering pump bracket. I have the psc pump and external reservoir now, not sure which bracket will work.

@Bextreme04 You are correct, the 8.1 uses a tall deck block unique to itself. I was misinformed about it sharing the 502 block. I’m familiar with raylar engineering and have been reading thru the writes ups. Plan is to stay stock and run cheap gas. I appreciate the info and link to engine mount adapters. Everything I read says the original style mounts can be used. I will see how the ORD mounts fit then go from there.

This is the most accurate info I’ve found

8.1's are based on traditional big block chevy, but share electronics with LSx family. 24x crank trigger, 1x cam trigger, coil per cylinder, drive by wire. All the bolt holes are in the same place as traditional BBC, except all holes are METRIC thread. The 8.1 is a tall deck engine, 10.2 vs 9.8 " deck height, so heads sit higher, and outward toward fenders a little more then regular big block. Exhaust manifold/header pattern IS THE SAME, but with metric holes.
Oil pan is unique. Mark 5 and Mark 6 oil pans don’t fit. The valve cover patter is similar to traditional BBC, except for one hole on each side. The heads use two additional head bolts, and a different bolt pattern. So 8100 heads WILL NOT go on traditional BBC, or vice verse.

The 8100 is net lash, no adjutment to valve train. However, you can get a stud from ARP with metric threads on bottom, standard on top, and run regular big block chevy adjustable valve train stuff.

Camshaft is roller, you CAN install older Mark V, Mark VI roller cam's. This will change firing order back to 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2. In stock form, the 8100 shares SAME firing order as LSx family. Programming would need done to change injector bank assignment.


@Vbb199 How will it cost more than an LS swap? The 8.1 is like swapping in most other big blocks expect you’ll need a wiring harness, ecm and upgraded fuel system. LS swap will need all that plus a conversion kit to run the sm465. I agree if crazy high hp numbers are the goal than a regular 454 will be a better choice to build with a larger variety of aftermarket parts. I want the 8.1 for modern fuel injection and low rpm torque. Not cheap to add aftermarket efi to an older motor. I would have used a 7.4l vortec but found a good deal on the 8.1l. No need to spend god awful amounts of money when the stock 8.1 makes plenty of power for a work truck. I’m not worried about the sm465.


I figured you'd likely just be using it as a utilitarian type setup.

There ain't but one reason (i) personally would own a large displacement motor, and that's to curl the hair of a moostang owners coyote lol


For what I suspected you're using it for, it'll work great! Sm465 and all!

I didn't necessarily mean dropping it in the hole is more expensive than a LS swap

But going from a small block build to a stock LS doesn't require much change....
Exhaust sizing doesn't change, the trans doesn't have to be built.... it's all pretty simple.

Going from a sbc setup to a BBC setup with bigger exhaust, bigger radiators, a better/bigger trans, IS more expensive than a standard LS.

Please create a build thread on this, I'm anxious to see it.
 

CheemsK1500

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Posts
831
Reaction score
1,470
Location
Texas
First Name
Paul
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K1500
Engine Size
305
The 8.1 is still a powerhouse, even if it doesn't share much of anything with the smaller LS based stuff. The swap shouldn't be too hard though, since you have compatibility with most GM transmission and other drivetrain components.
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,423
Reaction score
5,533
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
My best friend growing up had one in his 73 Nova with twin chinese 80mm turbo's on it and a blow through carb. He ended up upgrading to Sniper EFI and then pulled the whole thing for an LT4/8L80e combo from Chevrolet performance because it wasn't reliable or daily drivable. He gets double the fuel mileage and much more usable power from the supercharged 6.2L. The 8.1L was a monster and super fun to drive, but he broke it a lot and it was hard to get parts and they were pricy.
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,423
Reaction score
5,533
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
Here’s the nova with the twin turbos and 8.1l
You must be registered for see images attach

And then here it is with the LT4
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,962
Reaction score
15,135
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
That's what I'm talking about !
Here’s the nova with the twin turbos and 8.1l
You must be registered for see images attach

And then here it is with the LT4
You must be registered for see images attach


It's one of them things. It's a dedicated punisher that you constantly dump money in lol

Such a waste, but so much fun, which is why I said, it's for gaptizing coyotes in a truck. lol

Within a respectable power level.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,164
Reaction score
7,922
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Search "Dirty Larry" on the other square body site. He's done exactly what your thinking. His thread will answer any question you can ponder.
 

TPISly-C10

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Posts
615
Reaction score
883
Location
Boucherville QC Canada
First Name
Sly
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
C-10 shortbox
Engine Size
LQ4 6.0L
The 8.1 is still a powerhouse, even if it doesn't share much of anything with the smaller LS based stuff. The swap shouldn't be too hard though, since you have compatibility with most GM transmission and other drivetrain components.
Agree! ;)
 

Attachments

  • _DSC5334.jpg
    _DSC5334.jpg
    142.5 KB · Views: 194

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
43,931
Posts
945,923
Members
35,974
Latest member
jm608
Top