Other than the meatier rotors being able to handle more heat, is there any reason the 1" brakes won't stop the truck just as well? I think the pads are identical.
Awhile ago, I was interested in the advantages (if any) of increased rotor thickness - so I did some research. Basically what I found agrees exactly with Christian's statement:
Believe that the main reason to go to the 1.25" rotors is for the higher handling of heat which can minimize warping, takes longer before any possible brake fade, and longer wear life.
Under normal circumstances (e.g. not being used on the track and not trailering extremely overweight loads), the only characteristic of a rotor that can reduce braking time/distance is diameter. Thicker rotors (along with other advanced manufacturing techniques like venting/cross drilling/slotting) have only one purpose - to improve heat retention and dissipation rates.
Those rates are the two key factors that prevent "brake fade". Brake fade refers to the loss of friction between the rotor and brake pads.
The reduction of friction - brake fade - is caused when the temperature at the interface of the disc and pad increases until it reaches the "kneepoint".
The kneepoint is that temperature value on the temperature-friction curve where the binding material - the resin used in the manufacturing process of the pads - begins to break down.
As the binding agent decomposes, it starts to "gas off". I searched - a long time - looking for an answer as to for why this condition causes brake fade. But, after a while I gave up - there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus on exactly how the release of the gas causes loss of friction.
Anyway,the bottom line:
Unless you plan on racing your truck on the track or pulling 40' trailers with it, I wouldn't waste my money on 1 1/4" rotors. You should have no concern about your stock brakes ever reaching the knee point.