TPI parts worth swapping?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mcarlo86

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Posts
567
Reaction score
1,045
Location
ND
First Name
Brian
Truck Year
1990
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350

I saw this ad the other day. I was curious if the TPI parts would be worth anything? What would need to be done to put a TPI system from a 305 on a 350? Are the injectors the same? Different tune? I would think the serpentine belt system would have some value if anything. I always liked the looks of the TPI and if I remember correctly, they did make pretty decent torque, so I thought that could be a good setup in a pickup/suburban. Thoughts?
 

Midnightmoon

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Posts
1,105
Reaction score
3,176
Location
Pennsylvania
First Name
Justin
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
305
Yes, a broad torque curve but pretty much limited above 4500 RPM. Would probably work well in a truck application. You would need a stand alone controller to run it I believe. No basic difference in a 305 or 350 application other than injectors if I remember correctly.

I have a spare lower intake manifold and upper plenum here that I bought to hand port. I have maybe $150 in the both of them. Don't over pay for the full system. There are still a lot of them out there. You should be able to score everything, manifold, runners, throttle body, fuel rails, injectors, etc. for under $400 in perfect condition.
 

bluex

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2013
Posts
1,971
Reaction score
2,576
Location
Spartanburg SC
First Name
Paul
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
I have a setup that I'm going to run on a vortec headed 383 with a holley terminator. Hoping for a nice big flat torque curve out of it...

I gave about 150 for the whole thing. Unfortunately the vortec lower was $400...
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
9,040
Reaction score
15,333
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
I'd say that'd be a cool setup to swap on an existing tbi 350 truck. Most of them don't have anymore cam left in them after 4500 anyway.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,439
Reaction score
28,345
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
That one is an '87. It looks to be complete.

I really like TPI. It's almost like big block torque in a small block. Almost. I never understood why GM didn't run it in trucks, as an option above TBI. With all stock parts, they do indeed peter out by 5k, but they can be made to handle more cubic inches and more rpm.
 

TPISly-C10

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Posts
615
Reaction score
883
Location
Boucherville QC Canada
First Name
Sly
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
C-10 shortbox
Engine Size
LQ4 6.0L
24 years ago was my first EFI TPI swap...work great nice little set up...and today is cheap ;)
 

Attachments

  • Cheez TPI 3.jpg
    Cheez TPI 3.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 104

mcarlo86

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Posts
567
Reaction score
1,045
Location
ND
First Name
Brian
Truck Year
1990
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
That one is an '87. It looks to be complete.

I really like TPI. It's almost like big block torque in a small block. Almost. I never understood why GM didn't run it in trucks, as an option above TBI. With all stock parts, they do indeed peter out by 5k, but they can be made to handle more cubic inches and more rpm.
So '87 would have the 9th injector, correct? I was reading somewhere that TPI setups from '90-92 are the most desirable. Is there anything to watch out for with this '87 setup?
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,439
Reaction score
28,345
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
So '87 would have the 9th injector, correct? I was reading somewhere that TPI setups from '90-92 are the most desirable. Is there anything to watch out for with this '87 setup?

Yes, it has the 9th injector. Not a big deal and if you come across higher flow runners that are without the injector, tuning can replace the cold start enrichment. '88 was the last year for the 9th injector. '87 was the first year for the splayed center intake bolts. It was also the last year for v-belts, but the alternator bracket was different from previous years because it was designed for the cs130 alternator. Also, '87 was the first year for that smog pump divertor setup.

I personally do not have a year preference. You just need to be aware of the differences for swapping and modifications. The '85-'89 maf system is a little more forgiving for variances. '89 is the start of the VATS security system. '90-'92 MAP systems are capable of more airflow (and no old/aftermarket MAF gremlins) but get upset easier from modification.

I've had several TPI Camaros, all of them MAF systems. No complaints about any of them. I currently have an '86 350 with an old Crane CompuCam, Edelbrock RPM aluminum heads, 24lb injectors, headers and a nearly 100% stock TPI intake. The grunt that thing makes is awesome. I haven't updated the setup in nearly 20 years. What I'd really like to do now is swap the base and runners to an old Accel or SLP setup (or swap the whole deal for a First intake) and run a cam sensor to run a Holley Terminator system and go to a distributorless ignition. It basically would be most of the LS swap benefits, but the period correct look and badassness of the original TPI.
 

bluex

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2013
Posts
1,971
Reaction score
2,576
Location
Spartanburg SC
First Name
Paul
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
What I'd really like to do now is swap the base and runners to an old Accel or SLP setup (or swap the whole deal for a First intake) and run a cam sensor to run a Holley Terminator system and go to a distributorless ignition. It basically would be most of the LS swap benefits, but the period correct look and badassness of the original TPI.
My eventual plan with mine is to go to LS coils using the Dual Sync distributor. It will also be sequential injection instead of batch fire like the oe system.

There are lots of benefits to a modern control and holley has a harness to run a tpi injection with a terminator so it really doesn't matter if you don't get the factory harness or pcm with them anymore. Plus the Holey will be much easier to tune an tolerable for nicer sounding cams.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,439
Reaction score
28,345
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
My eventual plan with mine is to go to LS coils using the Dual Sync distributor. It will also be sequential injection instead of batch fire like the oe system.

There are lots of benefits to a modern control and holley has a harness to run a tpi injection with a terminator so it really doesn't matter if you don't get the factory harness or pcm with them anymore. Plus the Holey will be much easier to tune an tolerable for nicer sounding cams.

My specific plan would be to use an EFI Connection cam sensor and timing cover setup, along with the distributor stub to drive the oil pump. Then mound the LS coils where the distributor cap used to be, and use a Terminator setup for an early style LS. I have no business trying to tune it myself. I was told that the Holley should self learn ok, then I could easily take it to someone that has tuning experience, if it's needed.
 

bluex

Full Access Member
Joined
May 9, 2013
Posts
1,971
Reaction score
2,576
Location
Spartanburg SC
First Name
Paul
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
My specific plan would be to use an EFI Connection cam sensor and timing cover setup, along with the distributor stub to drive the oil pump. Then mound the LS coils where the distributor cap used to be, and use a Terminator setup for an early style LS. I have no business trying to tune it myself. I was told that the Holley should self learn ok, then I could easily take it to someone that has tuning experience, if it's needed.
The dual sync distributor has a cam and crank sensor in it. You can get a flat cap for it when using it only for the sensors. No need to change the timing cover an add the sensor there with it! I honestly want the coils on the VC so people go wtf?

The self tuning is decent but it's only for the fuel trims. You need to manually set your desired afr, timing, accel enrichment, cold starts, etc. I don't like how they advertise them because people think it will "learn" everything on its own an you shouldn't have to touch it. People get suckered in by that an have high expectations an then are pissed that they have to adjust things. I've about stopped working on Snipers because of people's attitudes and shoddy installs....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,162
Posts
950,643
Members
36,276
Latest member
2manysquares2care
Top