Rear Brake Options 87

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Posts
41
Reaction score
14
Location
Richmond, VA
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
305
I have a 1987 R10 Silverado. Have been agonizing over my rear brake options.

Option 1: purist approach and install new drum brakes.

Option 2: disc brake conversion with the kit requiring axel removal.

Option 3: bolt on disc brake conversion that doesn’t require axel removal.

I will likely remove 305 and replace with 350 in the spring. Daily driver type stuff mostly.

Thoughts?
 

Craig Nedrow

NADAR UNDER THE RADAR
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Posts
1,033
Reaction score
2,165
Location
Washington State
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1973 (have two), 1985
Truck Model
K10, K20, C20
Engine Size
350, 454, 6.2 Detroit
What rear-end does the R10 have? 73 FF 14. I did drums, because I could get them local ie. fast so went that route. I like the simplicity and weight reduction of discs. HOWEVER, the FF 14 has three different (at least) factory braking setups. Mine is the smallest 11X2., or close. There is a 13 inch option, think 2.5 width. If you decide on drums, go big. Hydroboost is next on my list, with big drums, think it would be awesome. 2 cents
 

Bennyt

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Posts
1,188
Reaction score
1,824
Location
Surprise
First Name
Ben
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Rebuild the drums. You won't find much if any improvement in performance with rear disc's unless you are looking at a big brake kit with 4-6 pistons. The rear brakes do 30-40% of the braking, less unloaded. Disc's might give you a 10% improvement over the drums. So 10% of 30-40% isn't much and you'll be fighting parking brake issues and more. I've yet to see a kit that bolts on and doesn't require significant investment in time and money to sort it out.
 

GTX63

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2022
Posts
926
Reaction score
3,768
Location
Tennessee
First Name
Ty
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I would only go with rear discs on a truck I was hauling or pulling heavy loads, and in a mountainous area. I'm in Tennessee and I still wouldn't do it.
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,864
Reaction score
9,109
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Rebuild the drums. You won't find much if any improvement in performance with rear disc's unless you are looking at a big brake kit with 4-6 pistons. The rear brakes do 30-40% of the braking, less unloaded. Disc's might give you a 10% improvement over the drums. So 10% of 30-40% isn't much and you'll be fighting parking brake issues and more. I've yet to see a kit that bolts on and doesn't require significant investment in time and money to sort it out.
Plus - the rear system line pressure is regulated down via the proportioning valve.

If a person wanted more rear brake why wouldn't they just change the proportioning, open the pressure to the rears and let those puppies hunt?

Way easier than melting and re-pouring the whole rear brake system.

It's like driving around with a restrictor plate on the motor, and saying "whelp - I guess I have to build a new motor" instead of just removing the restrictor plate.

;)

K
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,771
Reaction score
998
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
Even the 2"x11" brakes with finned drums work very well. An optional brake package (JB5?) would have used 2-3/4" wide shoes. Keith would know for sure.

Do use name brand shoes, and do not machine the drums. Problem with that is the shoe arc would be different than the drum arc, causing the ends of the shoes to not touch the drum surface. Unless, of course, if you can find a shop than can "arc in" the shoes.

As for aftermarket rear discs kits, you could probably write a book about all the problems folks have encountered with them.
 

Geoduck

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2023
Posts
45
Reaction score
66
Location
PNW
First Name
Dan
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
305
I agree, stay with stock drum brakes they are simple and reliable.
Mike B makes an important point...... Quality brake pads do make a difference. I'd be curious what pads folks suggest.
Also you may want to look at replacing those aging brake hoses.
 

F-64

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Posts
118
Reaction score
102
Location
nyc
First Name
mike
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10 lwb
Engine Size
5.7 tbi stock
I have an 87 R10 longbed.
I run a Willwood proportioning valve on the stock rear drum brakes. I had to remove the stock valve as I'm running a larger diameter tire on the rear compared to the front. I need to be able to adjust the balance.
I dialed down the rear brake pressure a lot. Unless you are carrying a load in the bed your rear brake pressure is very little.

The biggest change you can make to the R10 is improving front caliper brake pressure. I couldn't lock up the front brakes with the stock vacuum booster. I would roll through red lights with brake pedal buried.
I put a 3/4 ton hydroboost unit on my R10 and it has been perfect.

Another option is to use an OEM Hella vacuum pump to increase the pressure output of the booster( they have these pumps on Audi, Corvette, VW, Volvo, and many more).
I used one of these on a Kia to increase brake pressure by supplementing engine vacuum. You'll need some check valves, electrical relay, and an adjustable pressure switch.
And if your engine dies, you could still have power brakes if the electric vacuum pump still has voltage.

Anyway, the stock drum brakes are more than adequate on an R10.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,068
Posts
948,744
Members
36,136
Latest member
j20owner
Top