Front caliper upgrade?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Phil 83K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
185
Location
CT
First Name
Philip
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Funny thing about me is I like to be able to a stop…

My calipers are pretty crusty anyhow and I was toying with the idea of a more powerful braking experience. I came across Wilwood’s 140-11290 kit which is a D52 replacement bolt on caliper set that has dual 2” pistons rather than the single 2 15/16 OEM piston.

Now, I’m not a rocket surgeon but I have access to a calculator. Wilwood comes right out and says their piston surface area in these is 6.28 square inches. By my calculations, the single piston OEM has 6.77 square inches. So I’m having a hard time getting my wee brain around the idea of Wilwood’s calipers being an upgrade unless the dual piston design somehow distributes force on the pads better or maybe I’m missing something altogether and the internals of the OEM are less than they appear.

Any insight on the matter before I dump $500 on something that won’t work as well as the off the shelf reman parts is appreciated.
 

CalSgt

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2021
Posts
1,688
Reaction score
3,706
Location
CA
First Name
Casey
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
Chevy K-10 Custom Deluxe
Engine Size
350
Well, doesn't the large stock piston extend past the brake pad backing plate on 2 sides? Does that surface area count in the equation?

I don't know anything about the Wilwood's or brake science but my Dad just bought a set of Wilwood calipers and 2 piece rotors for his '56 Chevy and it seems like quality stuff...
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,867
Reaction score
9,123
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Funny thing about me is I like to be able to a stop…

My calipers are pretty crusty anyhow and I was toying with the idea of a more powerful braking experience. I came across Wilwood’s 140-11290 kit which is a D52 replacement bolt on caliper set that has dual 2” pistons rather than the single 2 15/16 OEM piston.

Now, I’m not a rocket surgeon but I have access to a calculator. Wilwood comes right out and says their piston surface area in these is 6.28 square inches. By my calculations, the single piston OEM has 6.77 square inches. So I’m having a hard time getting my wee brain around the idea of Wilwood’s calipers being an upgrade unless the dual piston design somehow distributes force on the pads better or maybe I’m missing something altogether and the internals of the OEM are less than they appear.

Any insight on the matter before I dump $500 on something that won’t work as well as the off the shelf reman parts is appreciated.
Correct.

1 - Two pistons distribute the load on the pad better.

2- The smaller pistons have a better "L over D" ratio. That is, the single piston is really short and large in diameter, which can make it more prone to "cocking" in the bore, especially once you start to get some taper wear on the pad (it just feeds on itself from there). The dual pistons are smaller diameter and longer, allowing the load to be placed more axially with less scraping on the side of the bore.

K
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
6,944
Reaction score
12,173
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
^Exactly.
Force = pressure x surface area.
In a static situation and discounting any small efficiencies or losses of a slightly different design, the force able to be applied for any given pressure is 100% a function of surface area.
It’s what Keith said that makes the difference.

However an honest seat of the pants comparison/opinion is needed. I don’t have any experience with wil wood or other upgraded brakes.
 

Redfish

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
2,626
Reaction score
14,189
Location
Prairieville, LA
First Name
Andrew
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
350/5.7
I was just looking at these exact calipers last night. I am seriously considering trying these out. I am enjoying driving the truck all stock and so far the braking has been adequate. But this is a modification that no one can easily see and I like that a lot.
 

Phil 83K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
185
Location
CT
First Name
Philip
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Well, doesn't the large stock piston extend past the brake pad backing plate on 2 sides? Does that surface area count in the equation?

The surface area of the inside of the piston(s) is in direct proportion to the force that can be applied with a given amount of hydraulic pressure.

So a caliper with larger piston area pushes harder than one with smaller of the brake is stepped on with the same force.
 

Bennyt

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Posts
1,193
Reaction score
1,844
Location
Surprise
First Name
Ben
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
I bought a set for my sons truck as part of the brake upgrade and I felt was a very high quality part. They go on sale every once in awhile and I believe I paid roughly $275 for a pair unloaded through CPP 2-3 years ago. Stock calipers rebuilt will cost you almost half that so an extra $150 was well worth it. I used Powerstop Rotors/ pads from Summit. CPP Hydroboost and rebuilt the rear using the larger rear drums that came on some of the trucks. Unfortunately, haven't driven the truck yet so no feedback on that.
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
5,385
Reaction score
8,589
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I'd be interested in how it affected front to rear brake bias,it's something to consider.
 

Phil 83K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
185
Location
CT
First Name
Philip
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
I'd be interested in how it affected front to rear brake bias,it's something to consider.
Definitely a consideration for a straight swap without any other changes.
I already swapped the rear to discs and will be using an adjustable proportioning valve whenever I get around to plumbing.
 

Scott91370

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Posts
993
Reaction score
1,014
Location
Burleson, Tx
First Name
Scott
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Sierra1500
Engine Size
350
Looks like they're $375 now, with pads. That's really not a bad price.

I look forward to more reviews!
 

MrHorsepowerLSx

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2021
Posts
282
Reaction score
609
Location
New Jersey
First Name
Jeffrey
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
K35
Engine Size
454
Correct.

1 - Two pistons distribute the load on the pad better.

2- The smaller pistons have a better "L over D" ratio. That is, the single piston is really short and large in diameter, which can make it more prone to "cocking" in the bore, especially once you start to get some taper wear on the pad (it just feeds on itself from there). The dual pistons are smaller diameter and longer, allowing the load to be placed more axially with less scraping on the side of the bore.

K
This right here is why multi piston brakes are better then single piston setups.

I bought my set for $290 IIRC last year with pads. You will need a different banjo bolt than factory. I want to say they are 7/16-20
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
5,385
Reaction score
8,589
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I'll address my only concern right here,and I'll let people think for themselves,do their own research and take in all the comments everyone else wants to throw in. I have done brake upgrades on several cars been more than happy sometimes,not so much others. The worst was when I was young and dumb on a Porsche which are tricky to drive fast anyway but got my brake bias off nothing a proportioning valve wouldn't cure. I've also had steering issues by using spindles recommended by millions of people on the internet,and other times things have gone great just like I expected. Think,do your research,if another 50 bucks will make things better spend it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,081
Posts
949,016
Members
36,159
Latest member
KrazyKustoms
Top