factory electronic port injection 350 SBC

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,693
Reaction score
6,869
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
so i know this system was rare in the late 80s and 90s, dont know anything about it, but how valuable/good/easy is it to use in other applications?

I see one for sale and assuming you were buying a toast engine just for the setup, what value would it contain
 

1987 GMC Jimmy

Automobile Hoarder
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Posts
5,848
Reaction score
2,389
Location
Mississippi
First Name
Jesse
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500 Jimmy
Engine Size
350
You’re talking about the TPI like the Camaros and stuff used from 1985-92? I don’t think of these as particularly rare, somewhere between TBI that’s everywhere and OEM mechanical Ramjet that’s rare. I think there’s some niche value to TPI but nothing crazy.

They work, and they can be reliable, but TPI has haters. As with anything in this thing of ours, the technology got better and did so even during the TPI years so what we have available now/what we know now has left the TPI system behind. The early TPI systems were kind of a bastardization of engine management technologies (e.g. using an ESC style distributor on an FI setup), but they became more standardized later on. A speed density setup rather than a MAF exclusive one is almost certainly better so a later version is likely gonna be the most effective.

While TBI had the advantage of piggybacking off carburetors and CCC had to take most of the heat anyway because it slightly preceded all of them in standardizing electronic engine management for GM, the tech was still fairly new, and it seemed like they got TBI correct right out of the gate as far as starting and running go. Mixture control was kinda ding-**** on the older TPIs, hence why you have an extra cold start injector instead of making the other eight do the work for you. TPI has the reputation of being hot/cold sensitive. Theoretically, cold performance should be fine on an 89-92 version, but I don’t know why the hot performance would be bad unless there’s some kind of heat soak or fuel atomization issue that are endemic to the type.

Bottom line: I think as a swap candidate it’s worth looking into as long as you understand its blind spots and strengths/weaknesses.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
44,163
Posts
950,651
Members
36,276
Latest member
2manysquares2care
Top