Help with difficult problem!!! ‘83 K5/4” lift/NP208 mounting height with incorrect homemade spacers vs correct spacers???

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

BlazerBill

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Posts
103
Reaction score
83
Location
Texas
First Name
Billy
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
Chevy K5 Blazer
Engine Size
350
Hello everyone! I have several unusual problems, not just mentally, but also with my ‘83 K5 that I’ve been restoring and am ready to install a new crate SBC350 and the original (rebuilt) 700R4 tranny and NP208 transfer case that I pulled out of the K5. When I got the K5, it already had a 4” suspension lift and the trans/TC crossmember had what looks like cut off shock ends as spacers mounted in b/w the crossmember and the frame. It also had body bushings as spacers mounted under the transfer case adapter. See pics. I purchased new/correct adapter spacer mounts from ORD but now with using just the correct ORD spacer mounts, the crossmember bolt holes are about a 1/2 bolt diameter off of one of the four frame bolt holes. My guess is that since a previous owner installed the 4” lift, they spaced the crossmember down by using the 1-1/4” high cut off shock ends to reduce the rear driveshaft pinion angle however they also spaced up the TC adapter by installing the 2” high body bushings underneath the adapter. Effectively, this homemade configuration caused the adapter to be a total of 5/8” lower versus using the correct ORD adapter spacer mounts with no spacers in b/w the crossmember and frame. Since the crossmember to frame bolt holes don’t line up now using the correct mounts, I’m now wondering if I have the correct crossmember. Should I elongate the one hole that doesn’t line up? It is because of the shock end spacers that allowed enough “misalignment” in order to get the crossmember bolts in whereas the correct configuration of the crossmember when completely flanged up to the frame will not allow the one of the four bolts to go through. I confirmed in my Chevrolet Factory Assembly Manual that shows the crossmember bolted directly to the frame without spacers under the frame. Sorry for the lengthy explanation and problem difficulty. Hopefully, you guys can help me figure out what I should do. Thanks so much!!!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9807.jpeg
    IMG_9807.jpeg
    167.6 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_9810.jpeg
    IMG_9810.jpeg
    179 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_9809.jpeg
    IMG_9809.jpeg
    104.9 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_9808.jpeg
    IMG_9808.jpeg
    112.2 KB · Views: 36

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,438
Reaction score
28,337
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
That is the correct crossmember for an '83. Is it possible that you have the crossmember flipped around backwards?

How far off are the mounting holes?

Oh and there should be spacers, however, they simply go ABOVE the frame. All they do is allow the use of longer bolts, which are less likely to break when the frame flexes since they have more room to stretch.
 

BlazerBill

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Posts
103
Reaction score
83
Location
Texas
First Name
Billy
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
Chevy K5 Blazer
Engine Size
350
Thanks, if I turn the crossmember around more bolt holes are off. When positioned when one hole is off, it is off about a 1/4”. The bolt is a 1/2” diameter. I also need to know how high or how low the adapter should be considering the 4” lift. Obviously, the angle of the eng/trans/adapter and transfer case need to be aligned in order for the adapter to be bolted to the transmission and output shaft is aligned to properly engage the TC splines. So, if I mount the adapter properly with the correct adapter mounts and no spacers b/w the frame and crossmember, the adapter will dictate the alignment of the engine/transmission and transfer case, then what do I do to ensure the correct pinion angle of both driveshafts?
 
Last edited:

Old Guy Bill

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Posts
428
Reaction score
1,321
Location
KY
First Name
Bill
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
400
I believe we touched on this in your previous post.
You may need to loosen the motor mount to frame bolts to get a little wiggle room for the crossmember to line up. I believe those crossmember bolts should be 7/16” diameter bolts not 1/2” also.
The drive shaft angle may require the reared to be shimmed at the mounting pins.
The NP 208 is going to need a double cardigan in the drive shaft after the slip yoke.
 

BlazerBill

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Posts
103
Reaction score
83
Location
Texas
First Name
Billy
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
Chevy K5 Blazer
Engine Size
350
Okay, the engine and trans are not yet installed. I stumbled across this issue when trial fitting the crossmember and adapter with the new mounts. I cannot get the one bolt hole to line up and don’t think that even a 7/16” bolt would fit. Maybe a 3/8” bolt but is that sufficient? Or, should I open the hole up for the 1/2” bolt? I have a double cardon joint on the front driveshaft only and it looks like the rear axle has been tilted upwards. So, What else should I do? What angles should the driveshafts be at?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9813.jpeg
    IMG_9813.jpeg
    112.3 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_9814.jpeg
    IMG_9814.jpeg
    141.5 KB · Views: 48
Last edited:

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
30,438
Reaction score
28,337
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
With a 4 inch lift, the angles "usually" don't need addressed. That is built into the lift springs and the proper lift blocks, if equipped. If you get a driveline vibration, it's something you'll need to look into.

The factory bolts were 7/16". If 4 of those don't fit, imho, just open up the hole on just the one.
 

BlazerBill

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Posts
103
Reaction score
83
Location
Texas
First Name
Billy
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
Chevy K5 Blazer
Engine Size
350
The 7/16” bolts did work. Not sure why the bolt holes were grinded open for 1/2” bolts to be installed. Thanks for all your input!
 

rockriver

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2024
Posts
3
Reaction score
2
Location
odessa wa
First Name
kit
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
k25
Engine Size
350
Open up the hole. Don’t worry about angles unless you get vibration.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,154
Posts
950,495
Members
36,268
Latest member
JUKA
Top